A HOLLYWOOD film starring Samuel L. Jackson has been ridiculed as 'so bad it's good' by movie critics before it has even been completed.

... the movie's plot can be summarised in one sentence:

On board a flight over the Pacific Ocean, an assassin, bent on killing a passenger who's a witness in protective custody, let (sic) loose a crate full of deadly snakes.



Reaction to the film's title has been mixed - many critics have called the title 'brilliant', and 'the most appealing part of the film', other have asked why the movie has such an obvious name.

As one online critic said: There are snakes on the plane. End of f***ng story."

However efforts by executives to change the title to something more mundane, such as Pacific Air 121 were stopped by none other than lead actor and screen legend Samuel L. Jackson, who refused point blank to see the title altered in any way.

"Snakes on a Plane, man," said Jackson during a recent interview with Collider.com.

"We're totally changing that back. That's the only reason I took the job: I read the title."

Snakes on a plane 4: Snakes in a toy plane, which is on a rowboat, which is in the cargo bay of a plane, which in turn is parked on the deck of a larger boat. From outer space.

Calm down Raoul, man.

Stop tha lame 'Snakes on a Plane' puns. >.<

Are there any movies that are "so good they're bad"?

Starship Troopers comes to mind (not the sequel though... ick)

It's all about socialism and stuff... and no one got it.