Michael MacFarlane
Unwitting troll accomplice
Posts: 8,272
Even though I'm already on record above as saying that I won't see this movie, I also have to agree with alpha1, sort of. I've never put much stock into the idea that there's some magical time period that has to past before you can make a movie about a tragic event. The way such a movie is made, and whether it presents the events respectfully, is far more important to me than how long the filmmakers waited to make it. September 11th in particular made an impact on the American psyche like no other event in history -- the only parallels are the burning of Washington D.C. in the War of 1812, and Pearl Harbor, neither of which happened during the age of the big-budget film. Given this kind of impact, we all had to know it would inspire a few films, and that they'd be made sooner rather than later.
There's nothing inherently distasteful about making a film about one of the defining moments (for better or for worse) in this country's history. There's not even anything inherently distasteful about making money off a film about a tragedy, so long as it's made in a sufficiently respectful way.
[/pointless rambling]
If you think the waiters are rude, you should see the manager.