Here comes the nosy Arbitrator!
However, Spook is wrong on both counts.
Although the second one, which CoW cited, is kida silly, I don't dispute the prevalance of internet predators at all.
Quantitatively. Substantiate.

Originally posted by Spook:
This is like banning halloween because there might be razors in the candy.
Since that (banning halloween because there might be razors in the candy - see previous line) has never happened.
The only difference (difference between razors in halloween candy and internet sexual predators) here is that it (internet sexual predators) actually has happened. like, four times.
Since that (banning halloween because there might be razors in the candy - see previous line) has never happened.
The only difference (difference between razors in halloween candy and internet sexual predators) here is that it (internet sexual predators) actually has happened. like, four times.
Originally posted by A_Big_Fat_CoW:
Four times? (internet sexual predators) Add a couple zeroes to that (figure concerning internet sexual predators) and you'll be closer to the reality.
However, Spook is wrong on both counts.
Although the second one, which CoW cited, is kida silly, I don't dispute the prevalance of internet predators at all.
Quote:
But it's a silly action and it'll never pass. To even think it will is...well...asinine.
Quantitatively. Substantiate.