Massassi Forums Logo

This is the static archive of the Massassi Forums. The forums are closed indefinitely. Thanks for all the memories!

You can also download Super Old Archived Message Boards from when Massassi first started.

"View" counts are as of the day the forums were archived, and will no longer increase.

ForumsDiscussion Forum → For Those Of You Who Say Nanotechnology Is Crap
12
For Those Of You Who Say Nanotechnology Is Crap
2006-07-01, 11:14 PM #41
Originally posted by JediKirby:
Can they build nanobots that make me walk?

No?

Then they're useless.


not yet... obviously not yet. but someday, perhaps


Prey was a bit poor for Crichton. Wasn't a really driving narrative, and the pseudo-science behind the threat was far less believeable than it could have been... it's not the behavior of the nanobots themselves that was necessarily so far-fetched, but Crichton didn't keep it down-to-earth enough. Timeline was fantastic, the movie sucked hardcore. :( :(
2006-07-01, 11:21 PM #42
I didn't know there was a timeline movie (though I remember the video game). I think Michael Critchon's a pretty bad writer, but I'll just shut up now and stop raining on your parade.
COUCHMAN IS BACK BABY
2006-07-02, 12:03 AM #43
Originally posted by Jon`C:
Haha, yep. Just like a woman. Hypocritical too, given the crap posts you made in the Canada Day thread.

You need a new hobby. Like getting the hell off these forums and stop filling it with your bull****. Hell, you couldn't even stay unbanned from SA for more than a week. Your posts are as dumb as imsoshort's, they're as unfunny as SAJN_Master's, and they're as vitriolic as... well, mine. For Christ's sake, this entire thread was created to continue an argument with someone who doesn't even visit this forum! Dumb, unfunny and vitriolic right there! What the hell do you think you are doing?!

What the hell?

I was kidding in the Canada Day thread. Massassians just take everything way, way too seriously.

I don't need a new hobby. If you don't like me on these forums, get me banned. Telling me to "get off your forums lol" just makes me that more adamant to stay, even if only to piss you off (though trust me, there's other reasons I stay). Speaking of crapping up threads, you're doing a HELL of a job right now. My posts are "dumber than imsoshorts" really? That'd be a good insult...if it were true. I don't attempt to be funny that often, so "as unfunny as SAJNs" (which actually is quite an insult, but to be honest I don't really care) doesn't apply all that often, and vitriolic...well I'll give you that one.

Also, what the hell do you think YOU'RE doing. You don't own the forums, you don't admin the forums, but you keep whining about how I need to "get off your forums and stop filling them with bull**** waaaah". Grow up.


EDIT: For the record it was two weeks Jon. But I made a mistake in misinterpreting one of the rules. It was more adjusting than anything, and it wasn't for anything really malicious, but a misunderstanding on the admin's part, as far as I'm concerned (and it sure does seem suspicious that it got closed for no apparent reason... But I guess I must just be a "****wit" right? :v: ). But that's neither here nor there--saying "You couldn't even stay unbanned from SA" is like saying "You couldn't even survive in the war!", especially with stupid **** like autobans. Seriously, SA is easier to get banned from than any forum on the internet.
D E A T H
2006-07-02, 12:22 AM #44
[QUOTE=Dj Yoshi]I was kidding in the Canada Day thread. Massassians just take everything way, way too seriously.[/QUOTE]Oh okay. You're a tool! Haha, just kidding.

gg on the backpedal

Quote:
I don't need a new hobby. If you don't like me on these forums, get me banned. Telling me to "get off your forums lol" just makes me that more adamant to stay, even if only to piss you off
Troll admission #3.

Quote:
Speaking of crapping up threads, you're doing a HELL of a job right now. My posts are "dumber than imsoshorts" really? That'd be a good insult...if it were true.
It is true. You made this thread about nanotechnology but you couldn't even be bothered to post your own opinion about it -- beyond, of course, an insult directed toward someone that none of us know or care about. You didn't even bother posting a summary of the article or anything. This is a **** thread.

Quote:
Also, what the hell do you think YOU'RE doing. You don't own the forums, you don't admin the forums, but you keep whining about how I need to "get off your forums and stop filling them with bull**** waaaah". Grow up.
You're right, I don't own the forums. I don't admin the forums. And I'm also not the only person who's sick of your worthless ****.

Quote:
EDIT: For the record it was two weeks Jon. But I made a mistake in misinterpreting one of the rules. It was more adjusting than anything, and it wasn't for anything really malicious, but a misunderstanding on the admin's part, as far as I'm concerned
You're right, it's the admin's fault you can't read the rules.

Quote:
(and it sure does seem suspicious that it got closed for no apparent reason... But I guess I must just be a "****wit" right? :v: ).
You said it, but I won't say I'm not thinking it.

Quote:
But that's neither here nor there--saying "You couldn't even stay unbanned from SA" is like saying "You couldn't even survive in the war!", especially with stupid **** like autobans. Seriously, SA is easier to get banned from than any forum on the internet.
No, it's actually quite difficult to get banned from SA. In your case, you were talking about replacing your friend's cocaine with caffeine. This is a dickish thing to do by itself. But most of all, you were actually retarded enough to post your "ha ha hilarious" practical joke in a serious forum about drugs, and these rules are posted very clearly at the top of every single subforum.

Not that anybody was surprised, since you were well on your way to getting probation for posting your ****ty computer advice in SH/SC.
2006-07-02, 12:33 AM #45
Originally posted by Jon`C:
It is true. You made this thread about nanotechnology but you couldn't even be bothered to post your own opinion about it -- beyond, of course, an insult directed toward someone that none of us know or care about. You didn't even bother posting a summary of the article or anything. This is a **** thread.

So if I don't post my opinion on it it's auto-****? K.

Originally posted by Jon`C:
No, it's actually quite difficult to get banned from SA. In your case, you were talking about replacing your friend's cocaine with caffeine. This is a dickish thing to do by itself. But most of all, you were actually retarded enough to post your "ha ha hilarious" practical joke in a serious forum about drugs, and these rules are posted very clearly at the top of every single subforum.

How would you know it's a "dick"-ish thing to do? Cocaine and Caffeine have VERY similar effects, and considering I wasn't planning on selling it, and wasn't planning on just giving them that, and if I did give them any yay it would've been for FREE, it was just a practical joke. It's a "serious" forum, but there's also a post about the pranks you've done to people that you missed. One of them was replacing a bowl of weed with a bowl of tobacco, which made the guy puke. The only difference between caffeine and coke is that coke doesn't burn, and caffeine would've made them more geeked out.

Originally posted by Jon`C:
Not that anybody was surprised, since you were well on your way to getting probation for posting your ****ty computer advice in SH/SC.

My advice was fine. I probably would've been probated for calling the official guide misinformed, but I was more than willing to take that. Because it was. I still am yet to see a decent rebut to that other than "it was **** advice", which it wasn't...at all.
D E A T H
2006-07-02, 5:18 AM #46
Originally posted by JediGandalf:
All right let's not go into a large derail.

.
2006-07-02, 5:18 AM #47
if coke doesnt burn, how do you smoke it?
2006-07-02, 10:22 AM #48
[QUOTE=Mr. Stafford]if coke doesnt burn, how do you smoke it?[/QUOTE]
The sensation.
D E A T H
2006-07-02, 2:52 PM #49
one of my mates at uni is doing his PhD into nanotube research, I honestly don't know the details but it revolves around trying to find an efficient means of creating iron-filled carbon nanotubes...I'll see if I can get him to send me some of his pictures of tubes he has already made.
People of our generation should not be subjected to mornings.

Rbots
2006-07-02, 3:56 PM #50
Wow, banned yet again. At this rate, we need to add a "banned count" under the post count for every member :)
The cake is a lie... THE CAKE IS A LIE!!!!!
2006-07-02, 10:41 PM #51
Originally posted by SavageX378:
Wow, banned yet again. At this rate, we need to add a "banned count" under the post count for every member :)



That's a disturbingly good idea at 6:45am :P
2006-07-02, 11:49 PM #52
That would be good. And maybe a rank, with #1 being the most banninated all the way down to none at all, which wouldn't count. People with 1 ban each could all tie for a certain place. Man I'm tired and need to go to bed.
My JK Level Design | 2005 JK Hub Level Pack (Plexus) | Massassi Levels
2006-07-03, 12:41 PM #53
Originally posted by article:
The upshot of all this is that Seagate can use the heat-assisted recording to cram several terabits per square inch into a drive -- 10 times as much data into the disc than is currently possible.
:eek: wow. That's insanely cool.
If you choose not to decide, you still have made a choice.

Lassev: I guess there was something captivating in savagery, because I liked it.
2006-07-03, 9:04 PM #54
Originally posted by Chewbubba:
Unless the nanites give me super-strength, heal me at will, give me a built-in flashlight, leech the life out of organic matter, or stop incoming missles, then I'm not interested.


ROFL You forgot the ability to see through walls and highlight resources such as medkits and multitools.
Spoting an error in post will result in a $100 reward.
Offer expires on 6/6/06. Valid one per customer, per day.

Rangi
12

↑ Up to the top!