Blacks and mexicans make up a bigger percentage than any other demographic--as racist as it is, and as sad as it is, it's the truth. Inner cities are filled with black people who could give a **** less about society and only care about their gangs/drugs/guns/money that they make doing illegal/illicit things.

And this is alot different than when inner city gangs were comprised of white people.

Remind me, when was this? Most inner city gangs are comprised of blacks and mexicans with foreign influence (russian and chinese mostly from what I gather).

You've probably never even SEEN an inner city gang, projects, any **** like that, so why the **** are you pulling **** out of your *** and posting it as if it's fact?

Rewind to the industrial revolution.

Which the "gangs" were mostly irish, italian, and mexican with the only reason blacks weren't included was their limited rights to ownership among other things and their inability to leave their groups of similar race.

And what got the gangs broken up? The elimination of the lower-upper class gap (which is growing again), the introduction of the middle class, the elimination of poor pay/working conditions in factories, and the introduction of ****TONS of new industry to America.

Now, how long do you think that would take to introduce to a group of only a few races whose overall membership only accounts for 1/300th or so of the entire US population (probably much less, that's a gross estimation by my count), and who can't even FIND a job in the inner city. That's why drugs and gang mentality are so rampant--when your family lets you down, and you have nothing, you wanna have everything. Drugs give you money, gangs give you family.

You honestly have no scope of the situation, and are comparing two very different, very...well uncomparable microcosms.

No, the terrorists are mad at the democrats right now just like the far left voters that voted them to power. They were supposed to have forced our retreat by now.



There's nothing wrong with scientist that study the climate. The terrorists are just trying to gain favor politically, like American politicians, by pretending they are concerned with the notion of man-made global warming.

You seriously believe this?

Hahahaha. Oh my christ. This ****'s hilarious now, it's not even sad.

The terrorists have been echoing democrat talking points. It's really not debateable.

DEMS WORK FOR TERRISTS!

:downs:

Wookie and Mystic are the same people to me.

You sound like Ann Coulter. "Why do liberals hate America?"

Stop watching Fox News.

I'm missing the point where these weren't white people.

Democrats and Republicans are both extremely corrupt. That's no secret.

Vote Libertarian. They actually give a damn about personal freedoms.

I have a solution.

Move to Canada.

Ron Paul leans Libertarian on multiple issues and is probably their best shot at getting some Libertarian ideals in office.

Ahh yes, the corrupt administrators. Or, rather, one corrupt administrator. Either or both. Can't compete with me intellectually and too cowardly to openly confront me. Abuse of power just like flaming libs when they are in charge of anything larger than a porn store.

For anyone missing the connection, I'm referring to how my "avatar", for lack of a better term, was changed when somebody disagreed with me. I think it was the first time I pointed out that islam is inherently violent. It's not like virtually every middle eastern country and every other country being infested with the ideology isn't proving that point.

they don't want you

What the crap are you talking about?

Oh my GOD wookie. You just want to push a stupid agenda of racism and misunderstandings. Ever think it isn't the religion, but in fact the culture? Ever think it isn't the democrats, but instead the politicians? Ever think it's not God, but greed? How in the world can you wake up so one sided. Have you honestly decided that you want all of your ideals to be based on a set list of opinions shared by a group of people for the sake of simplifying voting choice?

You just described about 99% of the people on these forums.

Yeah, that's why there was a second paragraph. Also, I quoted Jon because his downs smiley was what the subtext under my username was changed to when some moderator decided he wanted to mock me. When I called the anonymous coward on it it was change to the down frown. Now he brings that up again. Whatever, I can take anything anybody here can dish out. On Internet or in person.

The irony kills.

I thought you meant administrator in the political context.

I'm not brining up any specific race. Religion isn't bound by race.



Islamic culture? Sure, I'll give you that. By the way, I don't want to discuss religion here. I only brought it up to explain my comments on the staff that hide behind their powers, whoever that person might have been.



Of course. I don't think the average democrat voter is a far left loon or as dangerous to America as the party's/Al Qaeda's talking points.



Got me there. I'm not religious so I have no clue what that's about.



I have conservative values. That leads me to have conservative opinions on a variety of issues. At least I'm consistent, unlike many Republicrats in office.



My ideals are my own. I'm simply a Republican by process of elimination and so that I can voice my opinions within a party as to what direction I want it to take. Libertarian is second best but they like the weed to much for my taste. Or maybe Reform. I was going to see if there is any cohesive platform to the party. A few years back they just seemed like a collection of misfits.

No, your opinions are not your own. You're a tool. Back your [all conservative] opinions up with law, facts, and knowledge of economy. Morality, bias, and greed are no longer permissible if you really want to convince me that you own your ideals.

You should go do this

You're an idiot.

Critical thinking!

Oh, okay, I'm off to write a thesis so I can prove to Kirby that my opinions are my own. I don't care if you think I'm a tool. And of what? Our far right wing conservative government? Bush and his congress failed because they weren't conservative enough.

Now, if you want me to rationally explain my position on a given issue, I might do that. The main reason I write things the way I do here is because no matter how anyone expresses a conservative opinion here, the vocal flaming left of massassi raises its nasty head of bitter insults. So I now have become jaded and gladly state my opinions in the most incindiery manner possible.



Just because you are the coolest guy on Massassi does not mean I'm going to jump off a cliff because you say so.



Wow, since you put it like that, sure. I mean pretty soon we're not going to have a young African-American male population in America. They're all going to be in prison or dead, one of the two.

Hahahahaha you think I'm an administrator :downs:

If I were I'd ban you just because I'm no longer amused by your incomprehensible jabbering. Which is, perhaps, one of the chief reasons I am not one.

I have a gold title because I'm special. Similar to how you have an emoticon in your title, because you're "special."

Or maybe they're clever enough to realize that legalizing drugs would utterly destroy drug lords and their crime rings. For reference, read up on alcohol and prohibition. Exact same concept.

A tool of a team sport. You have never expressed a legitimately based political opinion on this forum. I am not attacking your stanch conservativeness. I am attacking your inability to conceive of a government that doesn't fit your personal morals and tastes. Many liberals are just as guilty as you are, so don't try to play the anti-conservative card again. You're an opinionated tool of Red. You have no grounded political opinions. You are a self righteous idealist.

I already explained why I post the way I do here. Probably the only people on this board that may remember a time when I posted in a more civilized manner are Commander598 and Chewbubba. That was over at TACC. Probably a bit less liberal overall and a fewer number of dedicated posters so the conversations were better. Whatever, I told you I might address any issues on an individual basis. I'm sacrificing sleep right now. In the Army we get up early to train to defend the rights of the citizenry. This is my last post for the night.



I didn't say you were an administrator. I don't know if you are nor do I care. You simply remind me of the corrupt action one, or more, took. You probably would ban me. I doubt Kirby would complain about censorship then.



Legalizing drugs would simply be another cash cow for tax revenue and another way to control the poor. Whatever.

No you missed the part where the gangs were made for different reasons, exist for different reasons, and cannot be solved by the same situation because it's literally an IMPOSSIBILITY.

In fact you missed everything I said.

Explain. I see no support in this statement.

Translation: Stop picking on me. I'm full of myself because I choose to be in the military.



A: This is not America's server. B: I have no personal problem with you. We're debating politics. I forgot how you can't understand the separation of politics and personal opinions.



You don't understand economy, please don't post about it.

Whether you're on the legal end or not!

We shouldn't legalize them because that would mess up my opera- *ahem*

Seriously...how do legal drugs control the poor?

How is it that any administrative action can be considered corrupt?

They are not public servants. They are not elected, they are not employees of the public sector and as such they are not accountable to you or anybody else. This site is privately owned and you post here at their pleasure.

If they decide you are no longer welcome here, that is a valid decision for them to make in very much the same way that I can expel you from my property for being an insufferable tool or the way that McDonalds manager kicked you out for loudly explaining your beliefs in the restroom.

The very fact that any of us are here is a testament to how much crap the administrators are willing to take from a bunch of trained animals who think they're political scientists.

In short, and summizaring my post is perhaps the most important thing I can do in order to get my point across to you, the :saddowns: emoticon in your title was both well-deserved and a rightful decision by the administrator who did so. A telling sign of the fact that you deserve it may, perhaps, be the two facts that the rest of the administrators have not removed it nor punished the one responsible, and the fact that you are evidently too stupid to find the option to change it.

That emoticon isn't jumping off of a cliff.

But jumping off of a cliff is more painful. You should do that.