Especially when they're the result of rampant douchebagism, and only the douchebags get hurt.

As far as I overheard. The driver of this car was aggressively manuevering in and out of traffic (May have been tying to street race), clipped someone's back end, and then went up over the curb into a parked straight truck. I didn't see any other cars, so I think this was the only one really involved.

Cheer up dude, atleast your dubs didn't get scratched!

Also, the driver didn't appear to be that hurt, if the driver was who I thought it was. (Not the guy in the picture)

lulz

The coppers wouldn't let me take a picture from the other side.

But the truck was mostly un-hurt. The bumper was bent in, but thats about all I noticed.

Those are some sick rims man!

I hate when people think they are awesome by weaving in and out of traffic. Shows him right.

Woah! I can't believe it! That's amazing! Guaranteed lowest prices at Aaron's!

D:

Thats a furniture rental place.


I don't get furniture rental. Who the **** rents furniture?

Offices do.

People who order a couch from Macy's and it has a scheduled delivery date TWO MONTHS HENCE could benefit from a 2-month couch rental.

They don't rent office furniture though.

They rent like, house furniture. I don't get it. :/

If you are only in country for a few months for schooling or a temporary job assignment, it is cheaper to rent furniture than buy new furniture or transport it from your home country. In Maryland, this makes especially much sense. Incredible numbers of graduate students and foreign representatives come here for temporary purposes.

That is an awesome car...too bad a douchebag wrecked it.

There are accident on private roads.

I hate it when people assume that people "think they are awesome" when they are weaving in and out of traffic.

Yeah Im just usually in a hurry or trying to scare a girly that is in the car.

I know I am awesome.

They see me rollin

They hatin

this makes me want to play san andreas again.

Patrollin

And tryin to catch me ridin dirty

Um....

by what logic?!

free... expecting any form of logical post from mystic0 is like expecting water to be dry

Back in high school, at the end of my street, some lady had managed to back her car up into a tree. D:

I'm just too white and nerdy
I'm just too white and nerdy
LOOK AT ME I'M WHITE AND NERDY!

those damn trees always jumping out in the way

Rent-to-own.

You only pay about 150-250% of the actual msrp too.

There will always be accidents. Even if you screen drivers. Your absurd statement cannot be backed up.

Bonus: I thought you were Mr. libertarian freedom dude. You want to lessen our freedom to drive? Cognitive dissonance much?

!=



Fail.

Mystico, driving involves people encased in huge, heavy metal objects zooming towards and around each other, often from 50 - 70 mph. A lot of people drive. People are fallible. People are especially fallible when encased in big metal objects zooming towards each other at high speeds. The result is a car accident, no matter who owns the roads.

Not hyperbole. Ever. Under any circumstance.

yeah, that's the statement I was referring to

LOL, I'm finally convinced. You are a nutbox.

What makes one "natural" and the other not?

Not really because as sugarless said, ownership by itself has no impact on accident rates.

Liability is between the individuals involved in the crash, not the owner of the road. Fail.

Two people are driving on a straight road. One person gets distracted and swerves and hits the car next to it. Is it the driver's fault, or does the blame go wot the owner of the road? If you said the latter, there's a massive issue with your reasoning. No matter who owns the roads, as long as people are driving, there are going to be a lot of accidents.

Your Disneyland example makes no sense, because if a ride goes wrong there, it's not the fault of the children riding it, they're just sitting in their seats and they can't do a damn thing about it. The company makes the rides completely automated. The only transportation example that fits the analogy would be something like public transport, because the people using it are not in control of the vehicle. Going with that analogy, if two metro trains crashed into each other, you bet the government would hear about it.

Okay, you own a road. How do you stop people from crashing on it?

Freedom of association constitutes a violation of another's natural rights by your logic.

Oh god.. I was hoping you weren't going there. I didn't think you were that :downs:.

Hahaha. In your Market Anarchy dreamland, I wouldn't do business with you because you suck. All those damn restrictions.. I'd do business with someone who wasn't so freedom-killing and anal.

'course what I've never understood is how the **** can you keep people from using your road if it goes to an important place? That's why we have a central, unified transportation system. People don't want to negotiate with 17 road owners just to get to work, Mystic. That's stupid.

so with your system, depending on who owns that specific road, the qualifications for who may drive on it will change. So I could get halfway to work, but another company owns the other half of the roads on the trip there. SO I can get halfway to work and I have no way of going any farther. Taking a trip anywhere would require hours of research because you would need to look up the qualifications for every road you may drive on and anywhere you may stop to eat.

How about we regulate who can eat. People choke on food. Some people make really bad food that makes you choke. So 16 year olds are not allowed to eat because they are more likely to talk while eating, and that increases their risk of choking. And it's the maker of the food's fault for the 16 year old talking while eating and choking.

Or maybe it's the maker of the lunch table. A girl choked while eating at your table, so it obviously has to be your fault. Lunch table premiums go up as people start to choke at the table. Soon you have regulations on who can sit where to eat.

All demographics crash cars.

oh don't worry. I won't.

a question for mystic0....

will you ever shut up?