You people who think five years is too harsh scare the **** out of me.

If I did roughly the same act but to a young woman, I bet the reaction would be entirely different. If I lured this woman into a hotel room, ordered fellow men to grab her and prevent her escape, took out a Taser and shocked her, waited for her to fall to ground in pain in order to beat her with my shoes, and laughed at her misery while I applied "a scalding piece of metal" to scar her skin against her will, I'm pretty sure people will think 5 years would be justified. And what if this act wasn't about past romantic issues? What if this act was done because the woman was of a certain race and I just hate that particular one. Reasons could be anything really and alot has to do with descriptions of events, but I'll still be considered a monster.

She's obviously mentally unstable if she feels okay to laugh at the scarred victim after such an assault. I believe she deserves to be locked up away from society for 5 years, if not more, if the woman thinks this was an adequate resolution to such a trivial matter. Not to mention this was planned in advance instead of a spurr of the moment occurrence (like after a few drinks or something) just shows what kind of person she is. It's just "not a big deal" because it's a woman who is the criminal, which may be kinky to some, and it's somewhat humorous in the fact there is now a random "R" on the man's body. But besides that, no ones seems to care about the possible psychological impact on the victim after such an event, even if he's a man. Because things like rape is just surprise sex, amiright?