Massassi Forums Logo

This is the static archive of the Massassi Forums. The forums are closed indefinitely. Thanks for all the memories!

You can also download Super Old Archived Message Boards from when Massassi first started.

"View" counts are as of the day the forums were archived, and will no longer increase.

ForumsDiscussion Forum → Socialists: Obama no socialist
123
Socialists: Obama no socialist
2008-10-28, 9:04 PM #1
http://www.chicagotribune.com/news/chi-obama-chicago-socialist,0,4048540.story"]http://www.chicagotribune.com/news/chi-obama-chicago-socialist,0,4048540.story"]http://www.chicagotribune.com/news/chi-obama-chicago-socialist,0,4048540.story

Quote:
By Rex W. Huppke | Tribune staff reporter
October 20, 2008

These are hard times to be a socialist in America. And not just because there's a bourgeois-bloated Starbucks on every other corner, thumbing its capitalist nose at the proletariat.

No, it's tough these days because you've got politicians on the right, the same guys who just helped nationalize the banking system, derisively and inaccurately calling the presidential candidate on the left a socialist. That's enough to make Karl Marx harumph in his grave.

Local communists, rarely tapped as campaign pundits, say Sen. Barack Obama and his policies stand far afield from any form of socialism they know.

John Bachtell, the Illinois organizer for Communist Party USA, sees attempts by Sen. John McCain's campaign to label Obama a socialist as both offensive to socialists and a desperate ploy to tap into fears of voters who haven't forgotten their Cold War rhetoric.

"Red baiting is really the last refuge of scoundrels," Bachtell said. "It has nothing to do with the issues that are confronting the American people right now. It's just a big diversion."

Of course that's just one man's opinion. (And everyone knows you can't trust a communist.)

The "s-word" bubbled up from the McCain campaign after Obama said, in his chat with Joe the Plumber, that he thinks "when you spread the wealth around, it's good for everybody."

Well, that certainly sounds like the words of a Red Menace. But is it socialist?

There are about as many definitions for socialism as comedian Jeff Foxworthy has for the term "redneck."

So, how do you know if you're a socailist?

Generally, it involves espousing government control over a country's basic industries, like transportation, communication and energy, while also allowing some government regulation of private industries.

"Obama is about as far from being a socialist as Joe The Plumber is from being a rocket scientist," said Darrell West, director of governance studies at the Brookings Institution. "I think it's hard for McCain to call Obama a socialist when George Bush is nationalizing banks."

And this from Bruce Carruthers, a sociology professor at Northwestern University: "Obama is like a centre-liberal Democrat, and he is certainly not looking to overthrow capitalism. My goodness, he wouldn't have the support of someone like The Wizard of Omaha, Warren Buffet, if he truly was going to overthrow capitalism."

Bottom line: pure capitalism and socialism can be a difficult mix.

Which hits at the heart of the problem. Right now, with the economy in the tank, the idea of a little wealth sharing doesn't sound so bad to people whose 401k plans are worth less than the contents of their coin jars.

"The idea of closing that wealth gap, I think, is a concern for many, many Americans," said Teresa Albano, editor of the Chicago-based People's Weekly World, a communist newspaper. "I don't think people are going to respond negatively to the idea of spreading around the wealth."

Which is not to say that, by electing Obama, the country will gamely head down the path of socialism.

"The whole point of his policies don't really represent the political economy of the working class," said Robert Roman, who edits the newsletter of the roughly 250-member Chicago chapter of the Democratic Socialists of America. "Obama's going to be a person who represents all of us, he's going to be representing the interest of the capitalists as well as the working people. He's not really talking about transforming society beyond capitalism."

But don't worry, Sen. Obama. You're still likely to win the vote of avowed socialists.

"Having Obama as president would be greatly superior, from our point of view, than having McCain as president," Roman said.

And you can expect to see that quote in a McCain ad in 5, 4, 3, 2....

rhuppke@tribune.com


As I said in another forum, this article doesn't quite do the issue justice, however it's much better than what most of the media and to some extent even what Brian Moore has been doing in the media.
2008-10-28, 9:06 PM #2
You realize that the democrat candidate is called a socialist in every election? Right?
2008-10-28, 9:38 PM #3
Democrats are socialists and Republicans are fascists. That's how it works.
Democracy: rule by the stupid
2008-10-28, 9:51 PM #4
Btw just as a reference point this is an approximation of how the rest of the [civilized] world sees every American election

[http://i87.photobucket.com/albums/k133/kyle901/americanpolitics.png]

I should probably add a "LOL BURGERBOYS" or something but right now I'm just trolling out of standard tuesday night boredom and not actually embracing anti-americanism
Stuff
2008-10-28, 10:53 PM #5
hah
"it is time to get a credit card to complete my financial independance" — Tibby, Aug. 2009
2008-10-28, 10:54 PM #6
[http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v215/garosaon/emot-burger.gif]
Star Wars: TODOA | DXN - Deus Ex: Nihilum
2008-10-28, 10:57 PM #7
Originally posted by kyle90:
Btw just as a reference point this is an approximation of how the rest of the [civilized] world sees every American election

http://i87.photobucket.com/albums/k133/kyle901/americanpolitics.png

I should probably add a "LOL BURGERBOYS" or something but right now I'm just trolling out of standard tuesday night boredom and not actually embracing anti-americanism

Don't worry, FastGamerr will come along and do it for you...like he did all ready.
Code to the left of him, code to the right of him, code in front of him compil'd and thundered. Programm'd at with shot and $SHELL. Boldly he typed and well. Into the jaws of C. Into the mouth of PERL. Debug'd the 0x258.
2008-10-28, 11:28 PM #8
Originally posted by Kieran Horn:
Democrats are socialists and Republicans are fascists. That's how it works.


<3
Fincham: Where are you going?
Me: I have no idea
Fincham: I meant where are you sitting. This wasn't an existential question.
2008-10-29, 3:36 AM #9
I see Obama as being rather moderate & McCain as being slightly right of moderate. I'm personally pretty far left.
? :)
2008-10-29, 7:06 AM #10
Originally posted by kyle90:
Btw just as a reference point this is an approximation of how the rest of the [civilized] world sees every American election

[http://i87.photobucket.com/albums/k133/kyle901/americanpolitics.png]


lmao

This is so true. You'd be surprised how often people say there's no real left wing in American politics. Which is, of course, inaccurate.
I guess you could say however that things tend to lean a little less left than in a lot of other countries.

What's also funny is that no one outside the US understands this fear of socialism.
ORJ / My Level: ORJ Temple Tournament I
2008-10-29, 7:43 AM #11
Originally posted by ORJ_JoS:
lmao

This is so true. You'd be surprised how often people say there's no real left wing in American politics. Which is, of course, inaccurate.
I guess you could say however that things tend to lean a little less left than in a lot of other countries.

What's also funny is that no one outside the US understands this fear of socialism.

I'm a capitalist pig-dog and proooooud of it.

Late edit: This is how the neo-cons Americans see Europe's the World's elections
Attachment: 20393/worldPolitics.png (17,684 bytes)
Code to the left of him, code to the right of him, code in front of him compil'd and thundered. Programm'd at with shot and $SHELL. Boldly he typed and well. Into the jaws of C. Into the mouth of PERL. Debug'd the 0x258.
2008-10-29, 7:57 AM #12
Originally posted by kyle90:
[pic]


I've showed this pic to others outside of Massassi and they agree on this as well :P
$do || ! $do ; try
try: command not found
Ye Olde Galactic Empire Mission Editor (X-wing, TIE, XvT/BoP, XWA)
2008-10-29, 9:34 AM #13
Geez, Massassi is destroying my image of Obama. First, I find out in one thread that Obama is not, in fact, black. Now, I find out that he's not a socialist. So what is he?

:tfti:
2008-10-29, 9:38 AM #14
He's a Liberal, not a Socialist. Socialists don't believe in "Government intervention in the marketplace" as they want to have an economic system not based on private property. So it's inaccurate to describe "Liberals" (In the class or even American notion of the term) or Social Democrats (Like Bernie Sanders or even some Socialist parties in Europe) as Socialists. Although there is of course "Market Socialism", but that's still hardly "Liberal Socialism"
2008-10-29, 11:05 AM #15
eh, i still think hes has socialistic tendencies, of course i also think the current administration buying into public banks is a BS socialist move as well...
Welcome to the douchebag club. We'd give you some cookies, but some douche ate all of them. -Rob
2008-10-29, 11:17 AM #16
Originally posted by Darth_Alran:
eh, i still think hes has socialistic tendencies
Such as?
2008-10-29, 11:26 AM #17
Socialized healthcare is the only socialist thing Obama has ever suggested. Redistribution of wealth is simply a move towards a healthy economy, not a socialist one.

Also, this link is important for our more conservative members.
ᵗʰᵉᵇˢᵍ๒ᵍᵐᵃᶥᶫ∙ᶜᵒᵐ
ᴸᶥᵛᵉ ᴼᵑ ᴬᵈᵃᵐ
2008-10-29, 11:51 AM #18
Until Obama starts putting heavy regulation on hospitals and drug companies, it is not socialized medicine. So far all he wants to do is nationalized healthcare(which will only be mandatory for children, I believe), which is a funding issue, not a regulating one.

Now, if you were to ask be the chances of him funding healthcare without later putting heavy regulations on the drug companies and hospitals, that would be a different story.
Democracy: rule by the stupid
2008-10-29, 12:50 PM #19
Originally posted by JediKirby:
Also, this link is important for our more conservative members.


No, its not. His reasoning on some of his points is idiotic at best. The rest of his points are just standard "hate Bush" democrat talking points.
Life is beautiful.
2008-10-29, 1:01 PM #20
Originally posted by Rogue Leader:
No, its not. His reasoning on some of his points is idiotic at best. The rest of his points are just standard "hate Bush" democrat talking points.


Why do you say this like hating Bush is a bad thing? He's one of the worst presidents you've ever had, it's okay to hate him.
Looks like we're not going down after all, so nevermind.
2008-10-29, 1:05 PM #21
Originally posted by JediKirby:
Socialized healthcare is the only socialist thing Obama has ever suggested. Redistribution of wealth is simply a move towards a healthy economy, not a socialist one.

Also, this link is important for our more conservative members.


Every form of government redistributes wealth. That's what taxes are! Saying that Obama wants to redistribute the wealth is nothing more than pandering to the ignorant masses. Guess what, McCain wants to give your money to someone else too!
TAKES HINTS JUST FINE, STILL DOESN'T CARE
2008-10-29, 2:22 PM #22
Originally posted by Krokodile:
Why do you say this like hating Bush is a bad thing? He's one of the worst presidents you've ever had, it's okay to hate him.


Incredibly unpopular and probably not a very good President, but the "one of the worst presidents ever" talk should probably wait for at least ten years when the damage done by W. Bush can properly be assessed in its full historical context.
2008-10-29, 2:25 PM #23
Both candidates are so incredibly big-government (That is, LIBERAL) that it is damn near impossible for conservatives like me (That is, small-government) to tell them apart.

Which is why I'm just going to write in McBama. Or maybe vote for that libertarian guy. Libertarians, as a party, still fail just by merit of being a party, but at least he's not a democrat or republican.
2008-10-29, 2:28 PM #24
Speaking of the 'worst president ever', I still give the title to Kennedy. Best thing he ever did for us was get shot. Though it's sort of a tossup with Carter, who wasn't so much destructive as entirely useless.

And one of the best presidents? Nixon. Despite watergate.
2008-10-29, 3:09 PM #25
Originally posted by Krokodile:
Why do you say this like hating Bush is a bad thing? He's one of the worst presidents you've ever had, it's okay to hate him.


Well, he definitely wasn't a great president, but he wasn't the worst one either. I'm just saying that convincing conservatives to vote for Obama because Bush wasn't a good president is utterly ridiculous.
Life is beautiful.
2008-10-29, 3:14 PM #26
Originally posted by JM:
Speaking of the 'worst president ever', I still give the title to Kennedy. Best thing he ever did for us was get shot. Though it's sort of a tossup with Carter, who wasn't so much destructive as entirely useless.

And one of the best presidents? Nixon. Despite watergate.


Worst president? Woodrow Wilson because he ruined America. He later admitted as much after his presidency, though, which gains him major kudos as a person but that doesn't erase the fact that he had the power to veto and didn't.
"it is time to get a credit card to complete my financial independance" — Tibby, Aug. 2009
2008-10-29, 3:21 PM #27
I don't know much about Woodrow Wilson. What did he do?

Also, a president that didn't use the power of veto caused hell....gee...where have I heard this before...
Democracy: rule by the stupid
2008-10-29, 3:28 PM #28
Woodrow Wilson signed the Federal Reserve Act into law.
"it is time to get a credit card to complete my financial independance" — Tibby, Aug. 2009
2008-10-29, 3:53 PM #29
That *******.
Democracy: rule by the stupid
2008-10-29, 6:58 PM #30
I really think you all hate W 85% because of that Iraq dealie. It actually could have been executed very well and we'd probably be 85% out of that nation by now. Trouble is that it's been a cluster**** pretty much from the get-go. I think they tried to replicate the success they had in Afganistan in Iraq. But that's just my opinion.

Yeah he's made some baaaaad decisions but I don't think he's the worst. I still want him gone though. What sucks is that "Republicans" will never be disassociated with the Religious Right so we'll get "Prop 8" Republicans from here on out. Very disconcerting really. McCain is probably the tamest we're gonna have from Republicans as far as Bible thumping. Of course he brings Palin into the mix and that was epic fail.
Code to the left of him, code to the right of him, code in front of him compil'd and thundered. Programm'd at with shot and $SHELL. Boldly he typed and well. Into the jaws of C. Into the mouth of PERL. Debug'd the 0x258.
2008-10-29, 10:25 PM #31
Originally posted by JediKirby:
Socialized healthcare is the only socialist thing Obama has ever suggested. Redistribution of wealth is simply a move towards a healthy economy, not a socialist one.

Also, this link is important for our more conservative members.

Obama does not support socialized health care whatsoever. He did in the primaries say that he would like to have a single payer health care system, but that he didn't think it would pass in the US. His plan leaves all insurance/drug/health care companies very private. He just wants to subsidize the companies to lower costs, not make them government/public run.

As for the "redistribution of wealth". What type of economic system doesn't have some sort of redistribution of wealth? Wealth doesn't stay in the same hands forever, so even in the most free-market of systems, wealth moves around.

And for a point made earlier, any form of Taxation is redistribution of wealth (even at the lowest levels of taxation) There's nothing "Socialist" about redistribution of wealth.

(Granted I am actually a Socialist which just makes this framework of debate frustrating)
2008-10-29, 10:31 PM #32
Last I checked, Obama was going to raise taxes on higher-income and lower them on lower/middle income. He also says that health care is (or should be- I forget) a right. Excuse me..no, it's not.

And McCain wants to buy out bad mortgages.

They're both epic fail. .(
woot!
2008-10-29, 11:24 PM #33
Originally posted by JLee:
He also says that health care is (or should be- I forget) a right. Excuse me..no, it's not.(


If you're dying you go to a hospital and they have to help you no matter how much money you have. It's a right right now.
"it is time to get a credit card to complete my financial independance" — Tibby, Aug. 2009
2008-10-30, 5:38 AM #34
Originally posted by JLee:
Last I checked, Obama was going to raise taxes on higher-income and lower them on lower/middle income. He also says that health care is (or should be- I forget) a right. Excuse me..no, it's not.

And McCain wants to buy out bad mortgages.

They're both epic fail. .(

Progressive income tax does not equate to socialism. I don't see the relevance of this. Also saying that health care is a right (while it does seem quite humane) is also not socialist. Most European nations have socialized health care (which Obama is not even calling for) and 0% of them are Socialist countries.

The moral of the story: The McCain campaign has used the "socialist" word a lot recently (along with the "Ayers issue") as Red Baiting. McCain knows damn well Obama is no socialist, as Tom Brokaw pointed out on Meet the Press: would Obama have people like Warren Buffet advising his economic policy if Obama was a socialist (or if Buffet thought Obama was a socialist)?
2008-10-30, 6:57 AM #35
Do police and fire departments bill you after they intervene in a situation or put out a fire?
Detty. Professional Expert.
Flickr Twitter
2008-10-30, 7:10 AM #36
Taxes?
SnailIracing:n(500tpostshpereline)pants
-----------------------------@%
2008-10-30, 7:31 AM #37
Originally posted by Detty:
Do police and fire departments bill you after they intervene in a situation or put out a fire?

Yes they do actually. At least the Oceanside and Escondido Fire Departments send you the bill for the ambulance trip.
Code to the left of him, code to the right of him, code in front of him compil'd and thundered. Programm'd at with shot and $SHELL. Boldly he typed and well. Into the jaws of C. Into the mouth of PERL. Debug'd the 0x258.
2008-10-30, 7:56 AM #38
Originally posted by JediKirby:
Socialized healthcare is the only socialist thing Obama has ever suggested. Redistribution of wealth is simply a move towards a healthy economy, not a socialist one.

Also, this link is important for our more conservative members.


I like how the first thing listed is about race. No thanks.
It took a while for you to find me; I was hiding in the lime tree.
2008-10-30, 8:05 AM #39
Originally posted by dalf:
Yes they do actually. At least the Oceanside and Escondido Fire Departments send you the bill for the ambulance trip.

He never asked about Ambulances.

:psyduck:
Originally posted by Kieran Horn:
That *******.

He's also partially responsible for WW2.
nope.
2008-10-30, 8:06 AM #40
Fire Departamiento sends ambulancia!
123

↑ Up to the top!