Massassi Forums Logo

This is the static archive of the Massassi Forums. The forums are closed indefinitely. Thanks for all the memories!

You can also download Super Old Archived Message Boards from when Massassi first started.

"View" counts are as of the day the forums were archived, and will no longer increase.

☖ Forums → Discussion Forum → How tall are you?
12
How tall are you?
2010-01-15, 3:46 PM #41
bwa bwa I'm 5'11" and 170 now... I was 140 and same height in high school.
2010-01-15, 3:59 PM #42
3' on the dot.
ᵗʰᵉᵇˢᵍ๒ᵍᵐᵃᶥᶫ∙ᶜᵒᵐ
ᴸᶥᵛᵉ ᴼᵑ ᴬᵈᵃᵐ
2010-01-15, 4:30 PM #43
Kirbs, I knew I could count on you to hold the grounds of the outliers territory. :P

[Edit] Check out that sweet bell curve!
Author of the JK levels:
Sand Trap & Sand Trap (Night)
2010-01-15, 4:38 PM #44
Haha, Roxima is taller than mb.
nope.
2010-01-15, 4:57 PM #45
5'7".

Ich bin ein shortarse.
Hey, Blue? I'm loving the things you do. From the very first time, the fight you fight for will always be mine.
2010-01-15, 6:06 PM #46
Originally posted by BobTheMasher:
Yeah, but most people know their heights in inch increments. Under your system everyone whose height is an even number of inches above 5'4" would be confused as to where to put their height, as it would fall exactly on the dividing line.

Also, WHY AM I ALL ALONE?


That's why I said most people would infer that if they are, say, 5'6" they would be in the 5'4" - 5'6" category. Most people are vain enough to know if they are taller than the whole number and so someone that knows they are slightly taller than 5'6" would be in the 5'6" - 5'8" range. Now, anyone 5'6 1/2" would probably call themselves 5'7" which is not the intent of the opening poster and might lead to further inaccuracies in the poll. Not that it matters.
"I would rather claim to be an uneducated man than be mal-educated and claim to be otherwise." - Wookie 03:16

2010-01-15, 6:08 PM #47
Originally posted by Wookie06:
That's why I said most people would infer that if they are, say, 5'6" they would be in the 5'4" - 5'6" category. Most people are vain enough to know if they are taller than the whole number and so someone that knows they are slightly taller than 5'6" would be in the 5'6" - 5'8" range. Now, anyone 5'6 1/2" would probably call themselves 5'7" which is not the intent of the opening poster and might lead to further inaccuracies in the poll. Not that it matters.


I'm 5'6 1/2" and I voted for 5'6"

WHAT DOES THIS MEAN
2010-01-15, 6:13 PM #48
It means you're a shortarse.
nope.
2010-01-15, 6:32 PM #49
Originally posted by Gebohq:
I hit 6'6" (it's actually slightly above but I prefer to be shorter) and was 145lbs when I was 16 too. I'm 26 now. Yeah. Maybe when I hit 30? Honestly, unless the weight is distributed evenly (i.e. not just a gut), I'm thankful enough.


yeah at this point I don't think it's gonna "catch up to him." Scott is doomed to be freakishly skinny for all eterni- err the rest of his life.
If you choose not to decide, you still have made a choice.

Lassev: I guess there was something captivating in savagery, because I liked it.
2010-01-15, 6:33 PM #50
Originally posted by Wookie06:
That's why I said most people would infer that if they are, say, 5'6" they would be in the 5'4" - 5'6" category. Most people are vain enough to know if they are taller than the whole number and so someone that knows they are slightly taller than 5'6" would be in the 5'6" - 5'8" range. Now, anyone 5'6 1/2" would probably call themselves 5'7" which is not the intent of the opening poster and might lead to further inaccuracies in the poll. Not that it matters.


yeah I kinda did that.. I'm more in the 6'0 and 2/3" range. I rounded up.
If you choose not to decide, you still have made a choice.

Lassev: I guess there was something captivating in savagery, because I liked it.
2010-01-15, 6:44 PM #51
Yeah, like I said, it's not really a big deal. The range just seemed exclusionary and inviting inconsistency. Again, no big deal.
"I would rather claim to be an uneducated man than be mal-educated and claim to be otherwise." - Wookie 03:16

2010-01-15, 11:17 PM #52
6'0, 150-160 lbs, probably just over 150 currently

I have extremely thin bones, my wrists and legs right above my ankles are ridiculously skinny. I have little to no fat or muscle anywhere except my torso and upper legs.

I'm filling out very, very slowly at 22 years of age. I was probably fully grown heightwise at around 18-19, 135 lbs at 6'0.
2010-01-15, 11:19 PM #53
Originally posted by Gebohq:
6'6" (and to make it more freakish, I'm 155lbs.)

Skeleton.
2010-01-16, 8:42 AM #54
5'7", 1mb
[01:52] <~Nikumubeki> Because it's MBEGGAR BEGS LIKE A BEGONI.
2010-01-16, 10:56 AM #55
I am the ideal height and weight.
2010-01-16, 10:59 AM #56
5'10. 145 Lbs
Thats 10 Lbs heavier than i used to be :)

You yanks are far too tall.
Code:
if(getThingFlags(source) & 0x8){
  do her}
elseif(getThingFlags(source) & 0x4){
  do other babe}
else{
  do a dude}
2010-01-16, 12:10 PM #57
Originally posted by Antony:
I'm 5'11" or so. Never quite got to 6'. My mass is roughly 165lbs.



Pounds are units of force, not mass.

I'm 6'2", 150lbs.
2010-01-16, 12:41 PM #58
6', 170lbs at the moment. Could stand to be a little lighter, maybe 160, just to make it easier to ride up hills. Was 180 last year though, so have improved some anyway.
"You want the truth?! You can't handle the truth!! No truth-handler you!! Bah!! I deride your truth-handling ability!!"
2010-01-16, 2:49 PM #59
Originally posted by mb:
5'7", 1mb

:D

People should wiki this for clarification. And Connection I'm a bit like that too; my wrists are ridiculously skinny.
nope.
2010-01-16, 4:42 PM #60
MY wrists seem skinny, but I think it's just because my arms are long and skinny and I have slightly above average hands as well. I think if I got to a more appropriate weight they would seem more normal, haha.
Warhead[97]
2010-01-16, 4:52 PM #61
I have pretty big hands too, to the extent that I can't wear a bracelet watch because if I had enough links taken out to fit my wrist I wouldn't be able to fit it over my hand by a long shot.
nope.
2010-01-16, 5:08 PM #62
I'm 5'11" and 270lbs. I'm hoping by the end of this year to get to around 220lbs though.
obviously you've never been able to harness the power of cleavage...

maeve
2010-01-16, 5:22 PM #63
Originally posted by Obi_Kwiet:
Pounds are units of force, not mass.

I'm 6'2", 150lbs.

Well... whatever.
>>untie shoes
2010-01-16, 6:11 PM #64
I am 47 feet tall.

Originally posted by Ruthven:
5'10. 145 Lbs

Funny -- I always pictured you as 6'2, 160 lbs. :huh:
And when the moment is right, I'm gonna fly a kite.
2010-01-17, 12:06 AM #65
5'6.5"
2010-01-17, 9:24 AM #66
no GBK :( without rockclimbing i'm a lanky average height
Code:
if(getThingFlags(source) & 0x8){
  do her}
elseif(getThingFlags(source) & 0x4){
  do other babe}
else{
  do a dude}
2010-01-17, 9:31 AM #67
This poll can never succeed because men always add an inch and women always subtract two. In all measurements.
Epstein didn't kill himself.
2010-01-17, 9:44 AM #68
Originally posted by Baconfish:
:D

People should wiki this for clarification.

"mb, a rarely used unit of Imperial weight equal to 1000lbs or roughly 453 Kilograms"
?

Anyway, I think then that he'd be a lot more than 1 mb.
If you choose not to decide, you still have made a choice.

Lassev: I guess there was something captivating in savagery, because I liked it.
2010-01-17, 12:13 PM #69
People can really kill jokes when they aren't in the know. :P
nope.
2010-01-17, 1:00 PM #70
Originally posted by Spook:
This poll can never succeed because men always add an inch and women always subtract two. In all measurements.


I dunno, since I'm a lanky ******* I usually downplay my height. I'm 6'0 flat in the evening barefoot. So walking around in the morning in shoes with any kind of sole/heel, I'm definitely closer to 6'1 in shoes.
2010-01-18, 12:03 AM #71
I saw "5'4" or less" and immediately thought "2? Kirby and who?"

Oh, we're saying out height and weight?

1.8034e+10 Å
77110.7 g

Enjoy your math.
error; function{getsig} returns 'null'
12

↑ Up to the top!