I'm going to be the lone dissenter here. The Devil's advocate if you will. You obviously realized that this girl had issues before you met her. She had already lied to you, which was your first warning sign & you'd been coaching her (never mind that this is the same excuse that all of the sexual predators on the "To Catch A Predator" television show use) because you obviously recognized the fact that she's troubled. I don't buy that you met this girl in person w/o at least considering the possibility that she may be attractive & that if she is you may want to sleep w/ her. In other words, you had already entertained the possibility of sleeping w/ a disturbed girl. Do you then blame the disturbed girl for wanting to be closer to her mentor? To an extent. However, you can't play innocent & pretend that there weren't warning signs & that you aren't at least partially responsible for this predicament. Maybe you're not experienced enough w/ this sort of thing to identify them (I have no way of knowing either way) but I think that any armchair psychologist could've. I don't want this to come off as some sort of judgement because I personally think that the age of consent in the U.S. (18) is too high (from a strictly biological standpoint) but the fact of the matter is that girls that are this young are generally considered to be mentally inadequate for any type of relationship (including a purely physical one). I think you've led her on by continuing to see her because in her state of mind you're offering her hope (despite your words). I think that you were right to think that this girl needs help. However, I think you're wrong in thinking that you're the one to give it to her. There are professionals for that sort of thing & if she's lucky he won't sleep w/ her. That's my 2 cents. Take it or leave it.
? :)