Massassi Forums Logo

This is the static archive of the Massassi Forums. The forums are closed indefinitely. Thanks for all the memories!

You can also download Super Old Archived Message Boards from when Massassi first started.

"View" counts are as of the day the forums were archived, and will no longer increase.

ForumsDiscussion Forum → Hey guys so how about this God thing
12345
Hey guys so how about this God thing
2011-02-21, 12:49 PM #121
Originally posted by Flirbnic:
Mark:
7:9 And he said unto them, Full well ye reject the commandment of God, that ye may keep your own tradition.
"Whoso curseth father or mother, let him die the death."
7:10 For Moses said, Honour thy father and thy mother; and, Whoso curseth father or mother, let him die the death:


Matthew:
15:4 For God commanded, saying, Honour thy father and mother: and, He that curseth father or mother, let him die the death.
15:5 But ye say, Whosoever shall say to his father or his mother, It is a gift, by whatsoever thou mightest be profited by me;
15:6 And honour not his father or his mother, he shall be free. Thus have ye made the commandment of God of none effect by your tradition.

Here is, perhaps, a more unambiguous example of something morally unsound from the new testament:

Matthew 19:29 And every one that hath forsaken houses, or brethren, or sisters, or father, or mother, or wife, or children, or lands, for my name's sake, shall receive an hundredfold, and shall inherit everlasting life.

It hits close to home: My grandmother joined a church and at one point said, "this is my family now", pretty well disowning her actual family.

I'm disappointed in you, Flirb, for quoting out of context.
Quote:
1 The Pharisees and some of the teachers of the law who had come from Jerusalem gathered around Jesus 2 and saw some of his disciples eating food with hands that were defiled, that is, unwashed. 3 (The Pharisees and all the Jews do not eat unless they give their hands a ceremonial washing, holding to the tradition of the elders. 4 When they come from the marketplace they do not eat unless they wash. And they observe many other traditions, such as the washing of cups, pitchers and kettles.[a])
5 So the Pharisees and teachers of the law asked Jesus, “Why don’t your disciples live according to the tradition of the elders instead of eating their food with defiled hands?”

6 He replied, “Isaiah was right when he prophesied about you hypocrites; as it is written:

“‘These people honor me with their lips,
but their hearts are far from me.
7 They worship me in vain;
their teachings are merely human rules.’

8 You have let go of the commands of God and are holding on to human traditions.”

9 And he continued, “You have a fine way of setting aside the commands of God in order to observe[c] your own traditions! 10 For Moses said, ‘Honor your father and mother,’[d] and, ‘Anyone who curses their father or mother is to be put to death.’[e] 11 But you say that if anyone declares that what might have been used to help their father or mother is Corban (that is, devoted to God)— 12 then you no longer let them do anything for their father or mother. 13 Thus you nullify the word of God by your tradition that you have handed down. And you do many things like that.”

14 Again Jesus called the crowd to him and said, “Listen to me, everyone, and understand this. 15 Nothing outside a person can defile them by going into them. Rather, it is what comes out of a person that defiles them.” [16] [f]

17 After he had left the crowd and entered the house, his disciples asked him about this parable. 18 “Are you so dull?” he asked. “Don’t you see that nothing that enters a person from the outside can defile them? 19 For it doesn’t go into their heart but into their stomach, and then out of the body.” (In saying this, Jesus declared all foods clean.)

20 He went on: “What comes out of a person is what defiles them. 21 For it is from within, out of a person’s heart, that evil thoughts come—sexual immorality, theft, murder, 22 adultery, greed, malice, deceit, lewdness, envy, slander, arrogance and folly. 23 All these evils come from inside and defile a person.”

Quote:
Then some Pharisees and teachers of the law came to Jesus from Jerusalem and asked, 2 “Why do your disciples break the tradition of the elders? They don’t wash their hands before they eat!”
3 Jesus replied, “And why do you break the command of God for the sake of your tradition? 4 For God said, ‘Honor your father and mother’[a] and ‘Anyone who curses their father or mother is to be put to death.’ 5 But you say that if anyone declares that what might have been used to help their father or mother is ‘devoted to God,’ 6 they are not to ‘honor their father or mother’ with it. Thus you nullify the word of God for the sake of your tradition. 7 You hypocrites! Isaiah was right when he prophesied about you:

8 “‘These people honor me with their lips,
but their hearts are far from me.
9 They worship me in vain;
their teachings are merely human rules.’[c]”

10 Jesus called the crowd to him and said, “Listen and understand. 11 What goes into someone’s mouth does not defile them, but what comes out of their mouth, that is what defiles them.”

12 Then the disciples came to him and asked, “Do you know that the Pharisees were offended when they heard this?”

13 He replied, “Every plant that my heavenly Father has not planted will be pulled up by the roots. 14 Leave them; they are blind guides.[d] If the blind lead the blind, both will fall into a pit.”

15 Peter said, “Explain the parable to us.”

16 “Are you still so dull?” Jesus asked them. 17 “Don’t you see that whatever enters the mouth goes into the stomach and then out of the body? 18 But the things that come out of a person’s mouth come from the heart, and these defile them. 19 For out of the heart come evil thoughts—murder, adultery, sexual immorality, theft, false testimony, slander. 20 These are what defile a person; but eating with unwashed hands does not defile them.”

Quote:
16 Just then a man came up to Jesus and asked, “Teacher, what good thing must I do to get eternal life?”
17 “Why do you ask me about what is good?” Jesus replied. “There is only One who is good. If you want to enter life, keep the commandments.”

18 “Which ones?” he inquired.

Jesus replied, “‘You shall not murder, you shall not commit adultery, you shall not steal, you shall not give false testimony, 19 honor your father and mother,’[c] and ‘love your neighbor as yourself.’[d]”

20 “All these I have kept,” the young man said. “What do I still lack?”

21 Jesus answered, “If you want to be perfect, go, sell your possessions and give to the poor, and you will have treasure in heaven. Then come, follow me.”

22 When the young man heard this, he went away sad, because he had great wealth.

23 Then Jesus said to his disciples, “Truly I tell you, it is hard for someone who is rich to enter the kingdom of heaven. 24 Again I tell you, it is easier for a camel to go through the eye of a needle than for someone who is rich to enter the kingdom of God.”

25 When the disciples heard this, they were greatly astonished and asked, “Who then can be saved?”

26 Jesus looked at them and said, “With man this is impossible, but with God all things are possible.”

27 Peter answered him, “We have left everything to follow you! What then will there be for us?”

28 Jesus said to them, “Truly I tell you, at the renewal of all things, when the Son of Man sits on his glorious throne, you who have followed me will also sit on twelve thrones, judging the twelve tribes of Israel. 29 And everyone who has left houses or brothers or sisters or father or mother or wife[e] or children or fields for my sake will receive a hundred times as much and will inherit eternal life. 30 But many who are first will be last, and many who are last will be first.

As has been at least hinted at before, a good chunk of what Jesus was about was railing on religious leaders who taught to follow the LETTER of the law above the SPIRIT of the law. He talks about not being attached to earthy things, even family (this isn't meant to be just your literal family -- the premise of a mob family fits well here too), if it means living a more moral life (though I don't believe Jesus would go as far as Buddha and say that renouncing all attachment is the way to a moral life). You spoke of not harboring hate, Flirb, but that is all I've heard from you for anyone who considers themself a Christian. I am not angry at you, but I do wish you would take a page from Dor's wisdom.
The Plothole: a home for amateur, inclusive, collaborative stories
http://forums.theplothole.net
2011-02-21, 1:11 PM #122
At least the religious people who killed Jesus weren't hypocrites. About killing Jesus, that is.

Emon's assertation that Jesus told people to kill their children illustrates another problem that exists on both sides of the argument.
2011-02-21, 1:20 PM #123
Originally posted by Gebohq:
I'm disappointed in you, Flirb, for quoting out of context.

I wanted to avoid posting a giant wall of text. The first two quotes I only posted because they were the lines Emon was probably referring to. The context of the third quote only reinforces how I interpreted it.



Quote:
He talks about not being attached to earthy things, even family (this isn't meant to be just your literal family -- the premise of a mob family fits well here too), if it means living a more moral life (though I don't believe Jesus would go as far as Buddha and say that renouncing all attachment is the way to a moral life).

According to one subjective interpretation.

Quote:
You spoke of not harboring hate, Flirb, but that is all I've heard from you for anyone who considers themself a Christian. I am not angry at you, but I do wish you would take a page from Dor's wisdom.


That's quite a grand accusation. I know what I am expressing, and it is not hate: It's moral outrage at something which warrants moral outrage. And it's the same thing Dor's expressing.
I'm just a little boy.
2011-02-21, 1:26 PM #124
That wasn't a grand accusation, Flirb, that was my interpretation of how you've come off. I no longer know how to better communicate my points across to you, as I appear to have failed doing so up to this point.
The Plothole: a home for amateur, inclusive, collaborative stories
http://forums.theplothole.net
2011-02-21, 1:30 PM #125
Well, my interpretation of your statement is that it was an accusation of hatred.
I'm just a little boy.
2011-02-21, 2:11 PM #126
Originally posted by need help:
Why do all atheist provide valid arguments for their beliefs, opposed to religious people, who come up with scientifically impossible claims to support their belief, or fall back on the argument 'you couldn't understand'/'god is beyond our grasp'?

Edit: Also, Kroko, way to go with starting this thread!


That isn't true. The majority of lay atheists (as opposed to the atheist ministry like Richard Dawkins, who says the same thing) say 'religion isn't true because it's silly to believe that kind of stuff'. HOLY **** THAT IS SO GOD DAMN ****ING SCIENTIFIC.
Epstein didn't kill himself.
2011-02-21, 2:45 PM #127
Originally posted by Tenshu2.0:
Now a question - who of you RIGHT now has a voice in his/her head telling you to strike at this post: telling me off, putting me down (and you "up"), making a sarcastic, hostile comment?

Not me at all. You're seeing the Bible for what it really is, which is fine. You aren't taking it to be historically factual. For me, truth is VERY important, and it's fascinating to me how people dismiss it.

Originally posted by Tenshu2.0:
That to me is what the Bible teaches, as do Marcus Aurelius, Epictetus, Buddha, Lao Tzu, etc...

Yeah, it just doesn't do a very good job of it.
Bassoon, n. A brazen instrument into which a fool blows out his brains.
2011-02-21, 2:47 PM #128
Originally posted by JM:
Emon's assertation that Jesus told people to kill their children illustrates another problem that exists on both sides of the argument.

It's not strictly about what Jesus said -- it's about what he said being open for interpretation, making it useless as a moral guideline. You inject your own morality into it as you interpret it.
Bassoon, n. A brazen instrument into which a fool blows out his brains.
2011-02-21, 2:47 PM #129
Originally posted by Flirbnic:
Mark:
7:9 And he said unto them, Full well ye reject the commandment of God, that ye may keep your own tradition.
"Whoso curseth father or mother, let him die the death."
7:10 For Moses said, Honour thy father and thy mother; and, Whoso curseth father or mother, let him die the death:


Matthew:
15:4 For God commanded, saying, Honour thy father and mother: and, He that curseth father or mother, let him die the death.
15:5 But ye say, Whosoever shall say to his father or his mother, It is a gift, by whatsoever thou mightest be profited by me;
15:6 And honour not his father or his mother, he shall be free. Thus have ye made the commandment of God of none effect by your tradition.


As Gebohq already said, this is out of context. Jesus isn't saying to kill children; He's referring to religious leaders being more concerned with the letter of the law and not the spirit of the law.

Originally posted by Flirbnic:
Here is, perhaps, a more unambiguous example of something morally unsound from the new testament:

Matthew 19:29 And every one that hath forsaken houses, or brethren, or sisters, or father, or mother, or wife, or children, or lands, for my name's sake, shall receive an hundredfold, and shall inherit everlasting life.

It hits close to home: My grandmother joined a church and at one point said, "this is my family now", pretty well disowning her actual family.


Also out of context. Jesus is saying that you should love God more than your family, possessions, etc.

Originally posted by Tenshu2.0:
Yep, that's the wonder of it all when you read through world literature and philosophy. This Jesus guy was not inherently unique (sorry to all the Jesus-fanatics :P) - he discovered something which others have discovered as well. Extremely practical for how to live a happy, stress-free life (instead of pretending).


A few answers here (not just to your arguments, but to various arguments being made):

http://www.gotquestions.org/Jesus-myth.html

http://www.gotquestions.org/why-believe-resurrection.html

http://www.gotquestions.org/did-Jesus-exist.html

http://www.gotquestions.org/Bible-errors.html
2011-02-21, 3:12 PM #130
Quote:
It's not strictly about what Jesus said -- it's about what he said being open for interpretation, making it useless as a moral guideline. You inject your own morality into it as you interpret it.


And I can interpret the second amendment to mean I have a right to giant furry limbs. It doesn't mean that both interpretations are equally valid.
2011-02-21, 3:19 PM #131
It's much easier to determine which interpretation is valid because the context and meaning of that particular time frame is well known. Morality is a lot less thoroughly defined, and Jesus' teachings are hardly comprehensive. What about copyright infringement? It's not strictly stealing, and in some cases it doesn't result in any property loss at all. What would Jesus think of it? **** if we know.
Bassoon, n. A brazen instrument into which a fool blows out his brains.
2011-02-21, 3:26 PM #132
Jesus preached poverty. He would probably not like copyright laws.

Also : Backpedal.
2011-02-21, 3:42 PM #133
Probably being an important word. He also thought theft was wrong, and whether or not it's stealing is a bit ambiguous. Because there is any room for interpretation means you must inject your own morality in order to come to a conclusion.

And what, my edit? I misinterpreted your post at first, so I changed my reply.
Bassoon, n. A brazen instrument into which a fool blows out his brains.
2011-02-21, 3:47 PM #134
The real question is: what does god need with a starship?
2011-02-21, 3:48 PM #135
Wow Tibby, you're worthless. Unfunny AND a misquote.
Bassoon, n. A brazen instrument into which a fool blows out his brains.
2011-02-21, 4:13 PM #136

You call me unfunny, but the quote is correct.
2011-02-21, 4:18 PM #137
Originally posted by JM:
And I can interpret the second amendment to mean I have a right to giant furry limbs. It doesn't mean that both interpretations are equally valid.


I support the right to arm bears.
2011-02-21, 4:18 PM #138
That's because you edited your post. :rolleyes:
Bassoon, n. A brazen instrument into which a fool blows out his brains.
2011-02-21, 9:08 PM #139
I left out the word "With" by accident.
can't sleep typos are going to eat me
2011-02-21, 11:55 PM #140
I have to say with a few exceptions (and im not talking about Emon) this is probably one of the best religious debates that have come up here. some really pointed questions have come up and several have caused me to re evaluate what I know/believe about Christianity. Did anything Change my mind? not a damn chance, but still a really good discussion.
Welcome to the douchebag club. We'd give you some cookies, but some douche ate all of them. -Rob
2011-02-23, 4:15 AM #141
Originally posted by Spook:
That isn't true. The majority of lay atheists (as opposed to the atheist ministry like Richard Dawkins, who says the same thing) say 'religion isn't true because it's silly to believe that kind of stuff'. HOLY **** THAT IS SO GOD DAMN ****ING SCIENTIFIC.


You are wrong. Most atheist do not believe in a kind of god because there is no way to prove it. Furthermore, we can deduce our origin to the very big bang. Short story: Somehow an infinitely dense matter expended. This resulted in mass, being converted into other elements through nuclear fusion. As stars explode, this matter is being slingshot into space. This matter forms planets through gravitational attraction between the particles of space dust. This hot space dust will eventually form solid planets. In the case that this planet is close enough to a star, natural phenomena like weather will arise. For the actual creation of 'life' (which are just complex interactions between molecules and atoms, described by both physics and chemistry) there are multiple theories. The most accepted and logical one is that high-charge electrical storms (weather) and intense heat and pressures formed the base of all life: nucleic acids, it won't take (relative to the life of the planet) before these nucleic acids form the most basic of organisms that can be described as life. Combine this with Darwin's Theory of evolution and you've got humans (fun fact: after oxygen-producing plants came into existence, most living organisms died, because the oxygen was toxic to them, from this point on, we can pretty accurately describe how life came into existence... again). There is no god in all of this, so the most logical conclusion would be: God doesn't exist.

If the bible should be interpreted as a metaphorical guideline on how to live your life: fine! But then don't bring god into the picture, as he is probably a metaphorical figure representing something else. And because this implies that humans wrote the bible as a moral guideline for themselves: God doesn't exist.

I'm not someone who clings onto his ideas and opinions just because I think that they're true. I like it when someone refutes my (and other people's) ideas and theories with solid arguments, but somehow, it has never happened.
2011-02-23, 4:54 AM #142
Your explanation of the big bang makes me :psyduck:
2011-02-23, 9:07 AM #143
I didn't start with the initial quantum fluctuations or during the inflation. I started after the dark ages, thank you very much.
2011-02-23, 10:35 AM #144
Originally posted by need help:
Furthermore, we can deduce our origin to the very big bang.


The big bang doesn't explain the origin of existence itself, however (and neither do any quantum fluctuations). This is where deists come in and say that God brought it about—which is unfortunately a non-answer, because it would follow that God must exist beforehand, and therefore existence precedes his act of creation. I came up with a better answer some time back and later discovered that it is very similar to the mathematical universe hypothesis.


Quote:
If the bible should be interpreted as a metaphorical guideline on how to live your life: fine!


As some of us have argued on this thread, this isn't really fine. Although the bible may appear to contain some pieces of good wisdom, they are afloat in a sea of atrocious ethics and ambiguous passages that can easily be interpreted to be in support of many different sets of morals. The use of the bible as a source of values and morals has again and again brought injustices into the world.
I'm just a little boy.
2011-02-23, 10:37 AM #145
The VERY big bang, in which the universe was expended

**** yeah
2011-02-23, 10:42 AM #146
Originally posted by saberopus:
The VERY big bang, in which the universe was expended


I like your mocking use of the word "very". need helps' problem is that we're using the universe as a reference point. In fact, based on our current knowledge we can call it an exactly average "big bang" ;)
TheJkWhoSaysNiTheJkWhoSaysNiTheJkWhoSaysNiTheJkWho
SaysNiTheJkWhoSaysNiTheJkWhoSaysNiTheJkWhoSaysNiTh
eJkWhoSaysNiTheJkWhoSaysNiTheJkWhoSaysNiTheJkWhoSa
ysNiTheJkWhoSaysNiTheJkWhoSaysNiTheJkWhoSaysNiTheJ
k
WhoSaysNiTheJkWhoSaysNiTheJkWhoSaysNiTheJkWhoSays
N
iTheJkWhoSaysNiTheJkWhoSaysNiTheJkWhoSaysNiTheJkW
2011-02-23, 11:41 AM #147
I feel I should clarify the importance of bringing up the "no true Scotsman" fallacy.

There is a tendency among people who argue in defense of Christianity, when confronted with the atrocities and injustices done in the name of Christianity, to say that the people who behave that way are misinterpreting or failing to correctly follow the teachings of Jesus, and that they can't truly be considered Christians. It's as though, by removing association with them, they expect to be absolved of any responsibility to defend Christianity in the face of such injustices. If you think that your own interpretation of Christianity should be the one representative of the religion, then you are turning a blind eye on the injustices that your religion has brought about.
I'm just a little boy.
2011-02-23, 12:41 PM #148
ITT: [http://img822.imageshack.us/img822/9279/brickwall.gif]
2011-02-23, 12:54 PM #149
Quote:
There is a tendency among people who argue in defense of Christianity, when confronted with the atrocities and injustices done in the name of Christianity, to say that the people who behave that way are misinterpreting or failing to correctly follow the teachings of Jesus, and that they can't truly be considered Christians. It's as though, by removing association with them, they expect to be absolved of any responsibility to defend Christianity in the face of such injustices. If you think that your own interpretation of Christianity should be the one representative of the religion, then you are turning a blind eye on the injustices that your religion has brought about.


Right! Except for the fact I'm not defending Christianity against the acts done in it's name, nor am I Christian. So, except for those two things, you're absolutely correct.

You bring up another point, though - Why would any person have a responsibility to explain the actions of any other? Okay, so the crusades were pretty bad and the inquisition was downright mean, but does a modern Christian have any responsibility to answer for those crimes? Does every muslim have to answer for what a few terrorists do in the name of Islam? Are modern Jews responsible for the slaughter of the Cananites? No, of course not. Each individual is only responsible for their own individual actions.

So, to summarize :

Nobody is defending Christianity for the awful things done in it's name.
At least one of the people arguing in favor of Jesus' philosophy isn't even Christian.
Nobody has any responsibility to defend Christianity in the first place, not even Christians.
2011-02-23, 1:04 PM #150
When people are arguing that Christianity teaches people to be good, honest and accountable for their actions I think it's down right ridiculous if they then choose to ignore the fact that other followers of the same teachings are shown to be the exact opposite of those characteristics. The whole argument of 'christantity teaches morals' is undermined to the point of being invalidated.

Believe in fairy tales all you like, but don't claim a benefit of said belief when it can be shown to have no positive effect. I could even argue it has the opposite effect because it gives people the feeling of organised moral superiority and justification for their actions.
TheJkWhoSaysNiTheJkWhoSaysNiTheJkWhoSaysNiTheJkWho
SaysNiTheJkWhoSaysNiTheJkWhoSaysNiTheJkWhoSaysNiTh
eJkWhoSaysNiTheJkWhoSaysNiTheJkWhoSaysNiTheJkWhoSa
ysNiTheJkWhoSaysNiTheJkWhoSaysNiTheJkWhoSaysNiTheJ
k
WhoSaysNiTheJkWhoSaysNiTheJkWhoSaysNiTheJkWhoSays
N
iTheJkWhoSaysNiTheJkWhoSaysNiTheJkWhoSaysNiTheJkW
2011-02-23, 1:15 PM #151
Originally posted by JM:
You bring up another point, though - Why would any person have a responsibility to explain the actions of any other? Okay, so the crusades were pretty bad and the inquisition was downright mean, but does a modern Christian have any responsibility to answer for those crimes?


Even an interpretation of Christianity that appears to be morally sound is still founded on the basis that the religion, and the bible, should be used as a source of values and morals, which is the same reasoning that results in crusades, inquisitions, and modern-day injustices that are still ongoing.
I'm just a little boy.
2011-02-23, 3:33 PM #152
Quote:
"Sooner or later you just figure out there are some guys who don't believe in God and they can prove He doesn't exist, and some other guys who do believe in God and they can prove He does exist, and the argument stopped being about God a long time ago and now it's about who is smarter, and honestly I don't care."
Donald Miller, "Blue Like Jazz"

This is one of my mostest favoritest quotes ever.
2011-02-23, 3:54 PM #153
It's not about that at all. Hey Steven, if you don't want to participate in the discussion, **** off. Don't post trite quotes to try to make yourself feel above the argument.
Bassoon, n. A brazen instrument into which a fool blows out his brains.
2011-02-23, 4:18 PM #154
<Nevermind, this is a waste. Clean the sand out of your vag, Olenik.>
2011-02-23, 7:22 PM #155
MORE FIYAH!
ORJ / My Level: ORJ Temple Tournament I
2011-02-24, 3:43 AM #156
Originally posted by Flirbnic:
The big bang doesn't explain the origin of existence itself, however (and neither do any quantum fluctuations). This is where deists come in and say that God brought it about—which is unfortunately a non-answer, because it would follow that God must exist beforehand, and therefore existence precedes his act of creation. I came up with a better answer some time back and later discovered that it is very similar to the mathematical universe hypothesis.

Interesting, I'll read it some time!

Quote:
As some of us have argued on this thread, this isn't really fine. Although the bible may appear to contain some pieces of good wisdom, they are afloat in a sea of atrocious ethics and ambiguous passages that can easily be interpreted to be in support of many different sets of morals. The use of the bible as a source of values and morals has again and again brought injustices into the world.

Also true, however, since Christians are already selective about what they take as truth, I just hope they'll leave out the atrocious and morally incorrect sections :psyduck:.

Originally posted by saberopus:
The VERY big bang, in which the universe was expended

**** yeah

Okay, my own fault. Sorry I'm not an native English speaker. The word 'very' was meant as: '...the very origin of...' or '...the very best thing...'. And 'expended' should obviously be written as 'expanded'. Thank you for pointing that out.

What I was trying to convey was that god has never played a role in our lives, ever. Why invent him?
2011-02-24, 1:02 PM #157


I liked this.
Detty. Professional Expert.
Flickr Twitter
2011-02-24, 3:46 PM #158
I think we can call this thread a wrap, folks, thanks to this breaking news from NASA:
NASA Completes 52 Year Mission to Find and Kill God
Also, I can kill you with my brain.
2011-02-24, 9:53 PM #159
Originally posted by Dormouse:
I think we can call this thread a wrap, folks, thanks to this breaking news from NASA:
NASA Completes 52 Year Mission to Find and Kill God


Dor, for this, I love you.
Epstein didn't kill himself.
2011-02-25, 12:22 AM #160
Originally posted by Steven:
<Nevermind, this is a waste. Clean the sand out of your vag, Olenik.>

You came here complaining.
Bassoon, n. A brazen instrument into which a fool blows out his brains.
12345

↑ Up to the top!