Totally agree. Detty has some good advice there.

Well I am not exactly an expert on relationships but I agree with Detty.

Though something to keep in mind is that you probably should not judge or get attached to one or the other until you have met both in person. Reason being is that some people communicate really well online using text, but down right stink at communication any where else. Not exactly what I would be looking for in a spouse or even good friend.

And to you Darth_Xasthur, there are still some of us who stick to traditional values. Perhaps I am sheltered and naive but I like to think that there are others out there who DO stick to traditional values, and I think that it is smart to look for those who share your same values in a good friend.

Dude I really dont care. I dont picture you as anything because I dont care.

Im just trying to conger up a laugh in myself, while also attempting to evoke a reaction. And it works. Seeing your indignation is worth every bit of making fun of anything and everything.

Actually, I just used it as an excuse to mention fake ****. No big deal. Everyone else likes it.

Im serious now, penty of girls i know marvel in a jealous rage at those chosen few... With enough money... The 1%.. Now those girls are on wall-street... Hookin...

Really, im disappointed noone appreciated my use of the word malarkey. No no no. Society is amused by fake ****.

Just as Sinclair said, "I aimed at the public's heart, and by accident I hit it in the stomach."

Or in this case the ****...

Oh, so you're just a troll, gotcha.

Self-acknowledged trolling... STOP! BANHAMMER TIME!

Yeah, these forums are pretty easy going but I'm waiting for it

Correction: You do not picture Deadman as anything because you've never seen his face, and you do not have a brain with enough functionality to imagine what he may look like.



Ah yes, admitting to blatant trolling. Also continuing to fail impressively at spelling.



I'm not sure which you're saying everyone else likes, but I'll correct you on both. If you're trying to suggest that everyone on this board likes fake boobs, then you're incorrect. If you're saying everyone else likes anything you have ever posted, you are wrong there too.




There are a lot of hookers on Wall Street? And who is in jealous rage at who? Try using complete thoughts in the future.



Being that no one appreciates anything you post here, it comes as no surprise to this member that your use of the word malarkey went unappreciated. I understand the confusion. You are under the impression that society (all of it) is only amused by fake breasts. I'm not sure which requires a lower level of intellect, though. Is it the person who is only amused by fake breasts, or the person who gets some serious lulz from an idiot posting the word malarkey on a message board. Perhaps a new thread with a poll is in order!



This quote has absolutely no relevance to anything you have posted in this thread. Regurgitating something you barely remember through the haze of marijuana smoke from your 10th grade literature class isn't going to impress anyone.

Please go away.

It's like he doesn't even know what we do here.

What exactly do we do here?

Whatever it is, it's not this:

Yes, unfortunately we don't all suck as well as Darth_Xasthur (citation needed... oh wait... here's the citation: http://forums.massassi.net/vb3/showthread.php?59707-Oops-%28Girls%29&p=1145673&viewfull=1#post1145673)

Holy ****, Xasthur's post is hilarious.

Anyone think Ki entirely overreacted and is the one who's lost points, not Ni? Watch out for that drama.

I guess i must take another one of my periodic hiatus from massassi. Just a year or two to let everything cool down so i don't get banned or get a hit put on me.

Self Massassi exile... The worst of all...

-

internet dating seems so weird. must be hella awkward when internet-daters actually meet face-to-face. thank god im still in college (mmm fresh young meat)... never have to use depressing **** like okcupid and match.com

I don't see why it's depressing. Some people just have standards.

If it's awkward, you're doing it wrong.

Agreed, I can accept it is socially normal and acceptable now, a LOT of people do it, but I wouldn't, i need the whole experience of awkwardly meeting someone for the first time and being all nervous, I think I would miss a huge part of the fun if I played about the beginning of a relationship from behind a computer screen

I imagine I'd be at least just as nervous meeting someone I met on the internet for a date IRL. But never tried, so what do I know.

-

While your type is not really my type, I would definitely bang both of them. So you know, props, dude.

Your type? Antony your type pretty much boils down to big ****.

That's a crass generalization!

Trust me, it is still very nerve-wracking the first time you meet.

The only thing I don't get are people who get so involved online that they talk about marriage without having even met in real life. I have a friend like that, and finally she flew out to see her boyfriend, and she was shocked how different it was in person.

As if that wasn't obvious. Internet dating should be used to meet people, not to forge a long-lasting relationship without meeting.

As obvious as that is, it is still a good summary

yeah but it's a crass, true generalization

hmm those are some costumey girls

I have met four women using those two websites and managed intercourse with two of them. That's a 50% success rate.

I have met a lot of women in real life and have managed intercourse with not very many of them percentage-wise. Let's call it a .1% success rate, just for argument's sake.

You do the math.

Well... yeah.

Now wait a minute here. What sort of math are we suppose to do.

You say you had a "success rate" of "50%" with online-met women, but that pool is limited to 4 entities. Then you give us a "0.1% success rate" with an unknown-sized pool without even deliniating any uncertainities. I assume this pool is greater than 4, but to establish a "0.1%" of anything implies that this is significantly greater number. So then how we suppose to seriously take the "50%" statistic mentioned earlier?

It's math. You just do it.

That implies you have tried to sleep with every woman you've met in real life

And?

nothing <_<

Again, no offense to all involved, but its posts like this that make me glad I've been out of the dating scene for 11 years and married for almost 7 of those years. Ni, hope things work out, man.

Not necessarily. I haven't tried to sleep with every woman I've met from the internet either. Sometimes things just happen.

a woman in a mood and not talking to you? well get used to that sort of bull****, they pull that one every week in my experience.
Perhaps u should consider staying single. Its a lot less stressful.

if(getThingFlags(source) & 0x8){
  do her}
elseif(getThingFlags(source) & 0x4){
  do other babe}
else{
  do a dude}

I am agreeing with Ruthven here.

Oh you jaded boys.