Massassi Forums Logo

This is the static archive of the Massassi Forums. The forums are closed indefinitely. Thanks for all the memories!

You can also download Super Old Archived Message Boards from when Massassi first started.

"View" counts are as of the day the forums were archived, and will no longer increase.

☖ Forums → Discussion Forum → Post your 3dmark05 score
123
Post your 3dmark05 score
2004-09-29, 9:48 PM #1
this one might make some of us curse our computers...

my score 2174

best framerate was on the demo with the flying ship and the big monster... 12.6fps

http://www.futuremark.com ONLY for people with cards that support ps2.0 or higher
eat right, exercise, die anyway
2004-09-29, 9:57 PM #2
since this thread needs at least one pic

i wanted to get one with the big monster and the flying ship... but this will do and since i can't add an attatchment through editing
eat right, exercise, die anyway
2004-09-29, 9:58 PM #3
Haha, 5 FPS.
2004-09-29, 10:02 PM #4
Wow this is gonna kill my comp. I am downloading it now. I just ordered an AMD 64 3200+ so once I get set up with that I think I'll try it. I don't even want to know what I get with my 2ghz P4 and crap RAM :(

[edit] Go check out the project browser at futuremarks site, highest score for 05 is 7777 last I checked. All the high scores for 05 are on highly overclocked AMD 64 or P4 systems with X800's and 6800's :(
2004-09-29, 10:19 PM #5
Downloading now. Ill run it after class tomorrow.
[01:52] <~Nikumubeki> Because it's MBEGGAR BEGS LIKE A BEGONI.
2004-09-29, 10:20 PM #6
I'd post just how bad mine would be, but at 200+ meg, I see no reason to download it over a 56k connection and then run it just for that purpose.
"In the beginning, the Universe was created. This has made a lot of people very angry and has been widely regarded as a bad move." - Douglas Adams
Are you finding Ling-Ling's head?
Last Stand
2004-09-29, 10:38 PM #7
more

[http://home.insightbb.com/~necropimp/3dmark05-2.jpg]
[http://home.insightbb.com/~necropimp/3dmark05-4.jpg]
eat right, exercise, die anyway
2004-09-29, 10:56 PM #8
Holy shizkadoodles! That terrain pic is fantabulous!
"it is time to get a credit card to complete my financial independance" — Tibby, Aug. 2009
2004-09-29, 10:59 PM #9
I'd love to see how my machine goes, but 283mb is way out of the question.
"Well ain't that a merry jelly." - FastGamerr

"You can actually see the waves of me not caring in the air." - fishstickz
2004-09-29, 11:18 PM #10
I got a score of 2230.

The space marine assault would make an awesome looking game.
2004-09-30, 4:14 AM #11
Quote:
Originally posted by finity5
Wow this is gonna kill my comp. I am downloading it now. I just ordered an AMD 64 3200+ so once I get set up with that I think I'll try it. I don't even want to know what I get with my 2ghz P4 and crap RAM :(

[edit] Go check out the project browser at futuremarks site, highest score for 05 is 7777 last I checked. All the high scores for 05 are on highly overclocked AMD 64 or P4 systems with X800's and 6800's :(


Your complaining? I use a p3 600 mhz with 256 MB 133 RAM
"Jayne, this is something the Captain has to do for himself"

"N-No it's not!"

"Oh."
2004-09-30, 6:00 AM #12
my score was 2636
[01:52] <~Nikumubeki> Because it's MBEGGAR BEGS LIKE A BEGONI.
2004-09-30, 7:28 AM #13
I took these screenshots @ 1024x1024 with 16x AF and 4x AA. Welcome to cinematic rendering...:eek: :eek: :eek: :eek:

http://blargh.mine.nu/test/78/7.jpg

http://blargh.mine.nu/test/78/81096554019.jpg

Oh, and I scored 2461.
Got a permanent feather in my cap;
Got a stretch to my stride;
a stroll to my step;
2004-09-30, 8:31 AM #14
I'm downloading it now. I think my computer would do alright, but I dunno if it supports PixelShader2.0.
"Flowers and a landscape were the only attractions here. And so, as there was no good reason for coming, nobody came."
2004-09-30, 8:47 AM #15
5495.
"She turned me into a newt!"
Pause
"Well I got better..."
2004-09-30, 9:09 AM #16
^ Holy****dude.
Bassoon, n. A brazen instrument into which a fool blows out his brains.
2004-09-30, 9:13 AM #17
I _think_ my card BARELY supports this. I hope so, :p since I'm downloading it.

2004-09-30, 9:35 AM #18
There is no way I'm even going to try.
Hey, Blue? I'm loving the things you do. From the very first time, the fight you fight for will always be mine.
2004-09-30, 10:05 AM #19
My poor old Radeon 7000 would beg for mercy under such loads... UT2k4 and Morrowind are the best it can handle reasonably. (mainly because the rest of the system gives it great help)
Wake up, George Lucas... The Matrix has you...
2004-09-30, 10:09 AM #20
204 :(

2004-09-30, 10:25 AM #21
Oh, yeah. The Radeon 7000 also doesn't have any support for any form of pixel shaders whatsoever...
Wake up, George Lucas... The Matrix has you...
2004-09-30, 10:46 AM #22
Neither does the GeForce 2, apparently.
Stuff
2004-09-30, 10:48 AM #23
Quote:
Originally posted by kyle90
Neither does the GeForce 2, apparently.

From what little I've been able to understand about the pre-FX series of GeForces, the 2 supported only up to version 1.1... I could be very wrong here.
Wake up, George Lucas... The Matrix has you...
2004-09-30, 11:17 AM #24
The 9x00 and above series of ATI cards and the 5600 and above series of nvidia cards support PS 2.0.
"She turned me into a newt!"
Pause
"Well I got better..."
2004-09-30, 11:46 AM #25
Mine ran at 1 fps, and with a weird black checkerboard thing over it. I didn't wait for it to go all the way through. :(
"Flowers and a landscape were the only attractions here. And so, as there was no good reason for coming, nobody came."
2004-09-30, 11:50 AM #26
That cherboard pattern means your card is overheating.
2004-09-30, 12:26 PM #27
Quote:
Originally posted by R_ivi_N
The 9x00 and above series of ATI cards and the 5600 and above series of nvidia cards support PS 2.0.


Minus the 9000, and 9200 of course, not to mention the 5200 supports PS/VS 2.0 as well.
Got a permanent feather in my cap;
Got a stretch to my stride;
a stroll to my step;
2004-09-30, 12:34 PM #28
I understood the GeForce cards once they got to the FX series... It ws just before then (three lines, one-and-a-half types of pixel shaders to support)

As for Radeon Cards, for some odd reason, PS/VS 2.0 support didn't occur until the 9500 series (anything earlier is 1.1 at most)... That's an odd anomaly for such an otherwise clean-cut line.
Wake up, George Lucas... The Matrix has you...
2004-09-30, 1:03 PM #29
How the hell did I get 204. I can only guess my GeForce FX 5200 is to blame. My 512mb memory and 1.8gHz should be enough otherwise to get a decent score...

2004-09-30, 1:15 PM #30
Quote:
Originally posted by The_Mega_ZZTer
How the hell did I get 204. I can only guess my GeForce FX 5200 is to blame. My 512mb memory and 1.8gHz should be enough otherwise to get a decent score...


The minimum requirements says a 2Ghz CPu is needed, and the 5200 was not designed to run any DX9 games, it just supports DX9 so OEMs can sell 'em and say "5200, MEET THE FUTURE WITH BLINDING ULTRA FAST DX9 CINEMATIC GRAPHICS". :p
Got a permanent feather in my cap;
Got a stretch to my stride;
a stroll to my step;
2004-09-30, 1:21 PM #31
2220, I guess I was expecting somewhere around that.
2004-09-30, 1:22 PM #32
Can someone tell me what this thing is???
America, home of the free gift with purchase.
2004-09-30, 1:24 PM #33
It's a 3D benchmarking program that stresses your hardware to the max, then gives you a score for your system based on calculations of framerate, time, and total # of frames (can't remember exact combo).

[edit] new score: 2297
2004-09-30, 3:12 PM #34
Quote:
Originally posted by Sol
Minus the 9000, and 9200 of course, not to mention the 5200 supports PS/VS 2.0 as well.


I would put supports in quotes as stated earlier. Hell, look at the 5200's 2003 scores...might as well not even get into 2005.
"She turned me into a newt!"
Pause
"Well I got better..."
2004-09-30, 3:26 PM #35
Quote:
Originally posted by nottheking
I understood the GeForce cards once they got to the FX series... It ws just before then (three lines, one-and-a-half types of pixel shaders to support)

As for Radeon Cards, for some odd reason, PS/VS 2.0 support didn't occur until the 9500 series (anything earlier is 1.1 at most)... That's an odd anomaly for such an otherwise clean-cut line.


IIRC, the 9700 was created first, then the 9500, then the 9600. That's why. That's also why the 9500 and the 9700 used the same core for a while.

I suppose I should expect something in th 4000s. Meh. We'll see.
D E A T H
2004-09-30, 4:56 PM #36
Errr...this make sme mad. I got a 942.

Am I mistaken in assuming that a 3.0ghz pentium 4 with 1 gig of RAM and a radeon 9800 pro 128mb should get a better score than that?
Warhead[97]
2004-09-30, 4:58 PM #37
I only got 2298. I have a 64 bit 3200+, and a Radeon 9800 pro 256 bit. I also have a gig of PC 3200 RAM. Isn't this a bit low?
2004-09-30, 5:15 PM #38
I got a 2610, with my Radeon 9800XT and my Athlon64 3200+ cpu with a gig of ram . . . I can't remember what speed of ram I have
"It sounds like an epidemic."
"Look, I don't know what that means. But it happens all the time." - Penny Arcade
Last.fm
2004-09-30, 5:23 PM #39
Quote:
Originally posted by BobTheMasher
Errr...this make sme mad. I got a 942.

Am I mistaken in assuming that a 3.0ghz pentium 4 with 1 gig of RAM and a radeon 9800 pro 128mb should get a better score than that?


you should be getting over 2100
eat right, exercise, die anyway
2004-09-30, 5:29 PM #40
I'm going to test now :)

3877

Oh yeah :cool:

I expected something a little higher, but not much. This is fine. My processor isn't that great, and neither is my RAM, but hey, it still gets the job done.
D E A T H
123

↑ Up to the top!