If you didn't like either canidate, you shouldn't have voted. Does that make sense to you? The choices were: Vote Bush, Vote Kerry, Vote Nader, or Don't Vote. If I don't like Bush, I ask myself if I like Nader. If I don't like nader, I ask myself if I like kerry. If I don't like any of them, I DON'T VOTE.
If someone offers you chocolate icecream, vanilla icecream, or taco icecream, and you don't like icecream, do you flip a coin and take that one? No. You don't take icecream.
Essentially, your vote put a sway on the entire presidential election. If 20 people in every state did what you did (And I fear that number is probably far higher than we might think) than we'd have no control over who is our president. The thing about voting, is the control you have over your country. If you vote, you're willing to take responsibility for the country's actions. You voted the president in. By flipping that coin, you take away everyone's power in this country.
You need to realize that it's your right to vote. It's not your right to take votes away from other people, no one has that right.
Oh, and those people who vote no matter who's running? They're still voting on ideals. Maybe those ideals aren't correct, maybe they are. But if everyone in the us feels the way those people do, than it's only right that the canidate they feel this way about be president.
Telling people to shut up because they won't believe your opinion as truth is a way to show that you're ignorant to reality. Instead of telling people to shut up, maybe you should take the time and listen to them, just as they have to you.
JediKirby
ᵗʰᵉᵇˢᵍ๒ᵍᵐᵃᶥᶫ∙ᶜᵒᵐ
ᴸᶥᵛᵉ ᴼᵑ ᴬᵈᵃᵐ