Quote:
Originally posted by Ewoklover
My point is that i would like for the forest to still be around for my children. I want them to be able to enjoy the peace and the nature of it. i really enjoy backpacking into parts of the mountains nobody has been and just relaxing in a small lake or on a rock. whatever:(
If there are no raods then nobody will start fires by throwing a cigerette out the window or anything. The fires will come naturally and we should let them burn naturally.
My point is that i would like for the forest to still be around for my children. I want them to be able to enjoy the peace and the nature of it. i really enjoy backpacking into parts of the mountains nobody has been and just relaxing in a small lake or on a rock. whatever:(
If there are no raods then nobody will start fires by throwing a cigerette out the window or anything. The fires will come naturally and we should let them burn naturally.
I seriously doubt that the forests will be wholly depleted in such a short period of time as you predict.
Sometimes humans need to kick-start the fires. Again, I go back to the Southern California fires of 2003. The underbrush wasn't being cleared away. Dead bark, brush, and tree just kept piling and piling. IIRC, there is/was a insect outbreak in our local forests that killing trees which only meant more fuel. Then when a fire did breakout, it burned for a LONG time and hot b/c it had all that underbrush.
Code to the left of him, code to the right of him, code in front of him compil'd and thundered. Programm'd at with shot and $SHELL. Boldly he typed and well. Into the jaws of C. Into the mouth of PERL. Debug'd the 0x258.