Massassi Forums Logo

This is the static archive of the Massassi Forums. The forums are closed indefinitely. Thanks for all the memories!

You can also download Super Old Archived Message Boards from when Massassi first started.

"View" counts are as of the day the forums were archived, and will no longer increase.

☖ Forums → Discussion Forum → Spiderman 3 - the official not SAJN review!
123
Spiderman 3 - the official not SAJN review!
2007-05-09, 6:24 PM #81
Originally posted by Aglar:
Die Hard 3 was good, but not as good as I and II.

Same with Lethal Weapon 3.

The Last Crusade was great, I'll give you that.


I'm sorry, did you just say Die hard 2 was better than Die hard 3?
That's like saying Star wars episode 3 was not as good as episode 1. It just doesn't make sense.
This signature agrees with the previously posted signatures. To violate previously posted signatures is a violation of the EULA for this signature and you will be subject to unruly behavior.
2007-05-09, 7:38 PM #82
I was going to say the same thing, Veger.
>>untie shoes
2007-05-10, 1:00 AM #83
Originally posted by DDRSDRAM:
I went and saw the movie last night. I have 5 good things about it that I liked.

1. Pirates of the Caribbean. At World's End.

2. The Bourne Ultimatium.

3. Rush Hour 3

4. Harry Potter and the Order of the Phoenix.

5. Fantastic 4 and The Rise of the Silver Surfer.

Well one subliminal message implied, even though Spider Man 3 was an eye sore, we have these potential awesome movies coming soon to you. Don't give up on the summer yet.


Replace that piece of crap Fantastic 4 movie with Transformers, and you're all set.

Seriously, I even tried to like the first F4 movie, but it sucked even for a cheesy super hero action flick.
"Guns don't kill people, I kill people."
2007-05-10, 2:22 AM #84
No way was F4 an action flick. There was like.. one fight.
You can't judge a book by it's file size
2007-05-10, 3:03 AM #85
Originally posted by Veger:
I'm sorry, did you just say Die hard 2 was better than Die hard 3?
That's like saying Star wars episode 3 was not as good as episode 1. It just doesn't make sense.


Wow I completely missed that.

If you think Die Hard With A Vengence is worse than Die Hard 2... You're just wrong.
nope.
2007-05-10, 6:27 AM #86
Indeed. The title Die Harder should have given a hint to the creativity of that sequel. With a Vengence, ftw, Jeremy Irons ruled.
twitter | flickr | last.fm | facebook |
2007-05-10, 7:32 AM #87
DHII felt like it fit the Die Hard paradigm better than DHIII. If viewing them as individual, unrelated movies, I would say III is better than II.
2007-05-10, 7:38 AM #88
There were only 3 movies.

So basically you're just saying that 2 was more like 1 than 3. :P
nope.
2007-05-10, 7:41 AM #89
2 makes me weep every time I see it because I know that people were paid more money than I will see in my lifetime to make that film.
omnia mea mecum porto
2007-05-10, 8:18 AM #90
I think I'm as surprised that everyone appears to hate 2 so much as you guys are that I don't hate it. What is so terrible about it? Maybe I'm just not remembering it right.
2007-05-10, 8:19 AM #91
II was more die hard-y because it was one guy against a team of trained mercenaries. III was the Wacky Adventures of Bruce Willis and Samuel L. Jackson.

I definitely liked III better but I do see where the argument is coming from.


But I still really like 2.
2007-05-10, 8:29 AM #92
Yeah, it's still a good movie.

It's just not as good as the other 2.
nope.
2007-05-10, 8:30 AM #93
Originally posted by Jon`C:
II was more die hard-y because it was one guy against a team of trained mercenaries. III was the Wacky Adventures of Bruce Willis and Samuel L. Jackson.

Yeah, that's what I was trying to say.
2007-05-10, 10:27 AM #94
Originally posted by JediKirby:
When the movie comes out, I'm going to edit it into the 15 minutes it could've been.


I'm going to keep you to that. o:
Seishun da!
2007-05-11, 9:06 AM #95
What a flaming piece of crap. I mean, I don't regret seeing it, but it certainly wasn't "good."

The whole middle section with all the scene kid hair/eyeliner was completely ridiculous. Up until then things weren't even going that bad, but from there on out it was all a big joke.
.
2007-05-11, 10:08 AM #96
There were people walking out before it finished when I saw it last sunday.

Correct me if Im wrong, but isnt this supposed to be an action movie, not a generic stereotypical "chick flick"?

My view: To many EMOtional moments and not enough fighting
The tips at the end of shoelaces are called "aglets". Their true purpose is sinister.
2007-05-11, 4:22 PM #97
Originally posted by Jon`C:
II was more die hard-y because it was one guy against a team of trained mercenaries. III was the Wacky Adventures of Bruce Willis and Samuel L. Jackson.

I definitely liked III better but I do see where the argument is coming from.


But I still really like 2.


As opposed to the Wacky Adventures of Bruce Willis and Dennis Franz, or Bruce Willis and the other black guy with the raspy voice.
"Guns don't kill people, I kill people."
2007-05-11, 5:35 PM #98
Originally posted by KOP_Snake:
or Bruce Willis and the other black guy with the raspy voice.


Carl Winslow.
"I got kicked off the high school debate team for saying 'Yeah? Well, **** you!'
... I thought I had won."
2007-05-11, 5:37 PM #99
Originally posted by Chaz Ghostle:
Carl Winslow.


No that was the first movie. The 2nd one had some guy that I dont even know if he's been in another movie/tv show. But his voice was raspy.
"Guns don't kill people, I kill people."
2007-05-11, 6:09 PM #100
Amazing, I managed to derail the spiderman thread into an argument about Die Hard. :P
nope.
2007-05-11, 9:42 PM #101
So am I the only person that has noticed SAJN has not posted his thoughts on the movie? I think this is the only way to prevent him from posting movie threads. Someone has to see all the movies before him and post early reviews with thread titles ridiculing him.
>>untie shoes
2007-05-11, 11:18 PM #102
But honestly, is it that bad of a thing when SAJN posts his opinion. Yeah, it's kind of silly that he ALWAYS makes the first post, but you guys are starting a vendetta against him.

Lay off guys, it's only the internet.
Marsz, marsz, Dąbrowski,
Z ziemi włoskiej do Polski,
Za twoim przewodem
Złączym się z narodem.
2007-05-12, 12:31 AM #103
Sooooooooooooo good.
"If you watch television news, you will know less about the world than if you just drink gin straight out of the bottle."
--Garrison Keillor
2007-05-12, 8:47 AM #104
Originally posted by Antony:
So am I the only person that has noticed SAJN has not posted his thoughts on the movie? I think this is the only way to prevent him from posting movie threads. Someone has to see all the movies before him and post early reviews with thread titles ridiculing him.


"I hated one, I loved two, three was meh."
- SAJN
Think while it's still legal.
2007-05-12, 12:13 PM #105
Well isn't this just the movie in a nutshell?
twitter | flickr | last.fm | facebook |
2007-05-13, 12:11 PM #106
Actually, yes it is.
2007-05-13, 12:18 PM #107
Yeah... only it's not at all.
>>untie shoes
2007-05-13, 12:50 PM #108
Yeah, you left out the gay walk and the stupid dance scene.

Also numerous crying scenes.
2007-05-13, 5:37 PM #109
Those crying scenes made me want to punch him in the face and tell him to suck it up.
DO NOT WANT.
2007-05-13, 7:35 PM #110
When Tobey Maguire's face is all screwed up in angst, he's absolutely despicable.

I had fun watching the movie, eh, I didn't expect it to be moving, so it was alright :D.
2007-05-13, 7:41 PM #111
You know, I don't have a problem with Spiderman crying, or any other attempt at character development. Well, except for when every attempt is just god awful, i.e. Spiderman 3.
www.dailyvault.com. - As Featured in Guitar Hero II!
123

↑ Up to the top!