Spectrael
I'm sorry, I didn't notice your wit
Posts: 417
Face-palm fest? Yea...
.08 is the standard DUI arrest point. Of course I didn't list other states, I have no idea which one you live in. But ONCE AGAIN YOU HAVE ABSOLUTELY NO READING COMPREHENSION WHAT SO EVER. This is what I find fascinating about this thread. I listed no other states because I was just getting the point across that I could very well get into trouble for drinking just one beer. Easy. To. Understand.
Just amazing. The comparison is just so far over your head it's beyond me.
I'm really at a loss for words here. This is just absolutely idiotic. I mean damn.
I do think you're being unsafe, and yes I'd agree that 95% of the population are unsafe drivers. I sure have broken my share of traffic laws. Way to go there Cool Matty where did you get that information? I mean I mentioned a few times now but I wasn't sure if you could actually comprehend it, seeing as how you can't anything else.
Driving itself is an option risk. I have already explained this in greater detail in an earlier post.
See above.
You complain about having to keep repeating yourself but you respond with the same arguement that's already been addressed, sometimes several times over.
Interstates are long, at least two lane wide divided highways. If you distance yourself from other vehicles and pay attention (not using bad judgement in the first place) there are very few times you would have to use snap judgement.
Again, already an addressed issue here. Smarter people than you say different. The law about a rolling stop wouldn't exist if someone, somewhere at some point in time didn't realise it was a problem.
No I don't.
No, it's just you being stupid. Me "speeding up" to the stop sign arguement you present is quite honestly one of the dumbest things I have ever read in my entire life. It makes no sense, mainly because of the fact it agrees with the tripe you post, yet you say it's not the same thing as rolling a stop. What I can't understand here is, if I had more time to look into oncoming traffic because I was at a complete stop, and when I ended up rolling the sign I was going slower than 5mph, yet you claim it isn't as 'safe' as you rolling a stop. It's absolute mind boggling, your reasoning.
You assumed I was going faster than 5mph, you were wrong. I didn't technically slow down for the stop sign because if I had, I wouldn't of been moving at all. I was going slower than what you say you roll a sign through. Do you not see the conflict in your reasoning? And the "legal reason" I got a ticket? I got a ticket FOR ROLLING A STOP SIGN. What the hell is wrong with you?
You can't comprehend anything either.