just browsing through the BBC website while bored out of my head and came across this story...
http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/world/asia-pacific/4123927.stm
seems as through there was a major quake off the Antarctic on the 24th of dec...
coincidence that two such large quakes occur in such a short time 'relatively' close to one another??
If you look on the links on the top right of the BBC page, notice how many largish quakes there has been within the last few months....
I'm no expert but do we normally have such large quakes on a regular basis? maybe we do but an 8.1 and ~9 within two days of each other in 'roughly' the same area, if you look at the attached image, and from what I gathered from doing some minor reading up, the Indian and Australian plates are sometimes taken to be one, called the Indo-Australian plate in the report...i've marked with the curvy black line where the join of the two plates are....
if you had horizontal movement of the 'Indo-Australian' with any of the pacific plates (its not specific in the report.....@@@ try saying pacific and specific quickly after one another and figuring out what you actually said....)....anyways, if this movement was large enough it would have created a build up on the join in the 'Indo-Australian' plates for sure....they can tell where the movement in quakes goes now, didn't someone think that 'oh maybe we better watch out for some activity around the Indian ocean...' and maybe put out a warning or something....
K, this is all looking back at the incident and its easy to make conclusions after the result, but i'm just a little surprised I haven't heard this other quake mentioned at all on the news....plus I also accept people and governments don't want to alarm people when there may not be any reason for it, we still don't know anywhere near enough to predict quakes, its just its seems a little odd that it hasn't been mentioned....