I love you too.

Cool it down, or I'll have to close this (and ban you.)

(And Deadman, that site is awesome. <3)

And yet.

Homophobia still isn't logical or rational!

http://dictionary.reference.com/search?q=phobia

Is your mind blown yet?

Neither should invalids. Or albinos. Or Gypsies. We need a Final Solution!

There was a black albino girl at my highschool.

Yes, it blew my mind as well.

That dialectilizer thing rocks

"Stat whuffo' doesn't yo' hoof it **** yo'seff"

Don't be sad, Shintock.

Here. Let me...

...comfort you.

*worship*

Heh, in some states gay sex is illegal.

[QUOTE=Vincent Valentine]Heh, in some states gay sex is illegal.[/QUOTE]Yeah, like Iran, Saudi Arabia and a few others in the US.

I hate it when admins do this. At least tell us what he did so we don't do it!

Um, use your imagination. It really isn't worth repeating.

He basically just said that me and a several million other people shouldn't exist. But with a lot of asterisks.

Vinny's got a banstick

Ahh.
It gets worse when you don't catch it and people respond by posting their favorite pictures of Hitler.

This is my rifle, this is my banstick; this is for fighting, this is for fun.

This thread reminds me of a recent Google quote of the day:

The mind of a bigot is like the pupil of the eye. The more light you shine on it, the more it will contract.

- Oliver Wendell Holmes Jr. (1841 - 1935)

What's really terrible is that Jep was always cool, and he gets pissed off here and "wham* - bannination.

Plenty of people here have gone overboard without any bans.

[QUOTE=Vincent Valentine]This is my rifle, this is my banstick; this is for fighting, this is for fun.[/QUOTE]
<3

Gay stuff isn't logical, because children can't result from it. That's the only thing I see wrong with it. I, however, think love is universal. I don't distinguish my love for my female and male friends. However, I couldn't have anything more than an intimate friendship with a male because I can't have children with a guy, and getting it in the pooper isn't my idea of "making love" A personal preference, so gaylove is perfectly ok by my standards. If they need the officiality of marriage to love eachother, why deny them that?

The only reason why I DON'T appreciate gay people is that [however, I'm not one to say who is gay, and who isn't] it's "cool" to be gay, now. I've heard opinions that homosexuality was reinstated as a marketing ploy for the next best cool thing for teenagers. Waltzing around acting like a *** isn't at all, in any way, a resemblance to who you love. I absolutelly HATE that being gay means being an affeminate man who wears tight geans and butthumps at gaybars. Why, exactly, one needs to be so showy if all that's different about them is their love interests, fails me.

Flashing your gaypride allows me to ask you why the hell you're gay: Is it to fit some steriotypical social class so you can feel unified, or do you truly feel love for the same sex? Or maybe you DO feel love for the same sex, but would love to cash in on it by living it as a "lifestyle." The moment your sex determines your lifestyle is the moment you're a sick pig. A straight guy is a pig if he lives a lifestyle based around his sex, and it's no different for you, gayboys.

I really just hate showy people. I don't wear "Midget Pride" T-Shirts or prefer people call me an Little Person. They can call me midget, crippled, whatever: That doesn't change who I am. If humans weren't so fed up with their goddamned labels, maybe we'd get something done along the lines of equality. Until then, people will DEFINE themselves as equal, and thus, destroy that equality with some sick reasoning of assumed equality.

JediKirby

Yes, it's really so terrible that we lose another extremely closeminded individual who advocates the nonexistence of entire groups of perfectly good people. "Always cool" is a bit of a stretch.

Kirby: I have a feeling it results from years and years of discrimination and belittling.. a reaction that results in assertiveness of common characteristics seems perfectly reasonable to me, but I suppose your dislike is targeted toward the more extreme "overreaction" that flaunts "gayness" or however you labeled it. Your issue isn't really with anything that has to do with homosexuality, but with an over-identification with one's labels. I.e., African-Americans who flaunt their "blackness" or wealthy people who flaunt their "richness" would annoy you equally as much, I hope.

Exactly.

And yet there are other close-minded people here that, time and time again, just irritate and frustrate everybody, and yet they don't get the ban stick.

Hey, if you are going to quote Dick Cheney, at least make the effort to cite him.

As for the opinion on gay marriage, I am in a weird quandary. I have always been solid on the fact that the definition of legal marraige is between a man and a woman. The state should promote the norm. On the other hand, I don't oppose the union of a gay couple for life. People deserve to be with people when they feel true companionship. I guess that I wouldn't want legal recognition of it because I don't want to teach my kids that the definition of legal marraige is a commitment between a man and woman, or a man and man, or a woman and woman, or a bisexual and a bisexual, or some other rare, odd, strange combination. So, overall, I am against gay marriage.

Because they manage to express their views in a slightly less genocidal manner.

And yet people like Freelancer are still annoying pains in the ***. Anyone remember that rape thread? It maybe wasn't genocidal, but it was ****ing insulting to a lot of people here.

Just slightly.

Freelancer's banned I believe.

Yup. It was a joyous occaision for a certain party when he was banned.

Well it was about ****ing time.

I'm still pissed about Jep getting banned though.

It's not forever.

And its just a message board, not the end of the world.

Oh damn, really???

Do not back talk the Timewolf.

I support it based off 3 major things.

1.) Catholic church said its wrong to have gays because the bible said so. I doubt we are reading an original copy of the bible anyway. But hey, everyone can trust the Catholic church. Not like they were ever wrong. Except for evolution. And the inquisition. Oh, as well as the crusades. That and the priests molestation. But other then that, they've never been wrong.

So lets totally avoid the fact that ancient cultures (Which were wiped out by other cultures) accepted it. These include the Romans and Greeks.

2.) Any government official who bases their opinion off of Christianity is throwing away the first ammendment of the constitution.

3.) This country is based on capitilism and free choice. There are more capitalistic gains based on homosexual marriage. A marriage license costs money. You pay the government. More gays getting married means more money financially. You file taxes together, you may end up paying more in taxes, more revenue for the government. Homosexuals who are married will have an easier time to acquire loans, loans provide interest. Interest and money spent on loans stimulates the economy. Purely on an economical level the government has more to gain.

I am basing mine off what I think is right as well as free enterprise. I see this as a more economical benefit for homosexuals as well as being right.

Yo, quick question. What whould they base their opinion off of?

this doesn't make any sense, for something to be logical there need to be children resulting from it?




that makes it wrong?






stereotype that is false from what i've seen, it isn't "cool" to be gay, its just a sexual prefrenece




it wasn't "reinstated" , this makes no sense, people did not establish homosexuality, it has always been here.




well using the three letter ** which I assume starts with an F shows ignorance and immaturity in the first place.

Second, you are assuming too much and are incorrect about the stereotype of being gay once again.





They need to "flash" gay pride because they are constantly put down by people like you who refer to them as "gayboys" and look down apon them/use terms that offend them (as you did previously)

Umm...Kirby's bisexual.

Also, it isn't logical if children don't result. The first and foremost feeling in any animal is that they need to survive, both them and their species. Homosexuality goes against this in every way.

Haha, calling someone a gayboy has absolutelly no bearings on who that person is. Dude, I'm bisexual. You just read my ENTIRE post with a big fat biased that made me look like I was attacking homosexuality. Reread my entire post without your twisted sense of offense.

Seriously, you literally took each and every quote out of context. Did you READ my opinion on universal love? Did you even read my post at all?

That 3 letter word starting with F means nothing different at all from Gay. Stop kidding yourself if you think applying different words for the same thing makes one more offensive than the other. The N word is only as bad as it's intended. Same with "Black." Intentions make the killer, not the gun.

JediKirby