Wolfy, that may be true on the small extent, but remember that case of the translation of Revenge of the Sith into Chinese then back to English? If the original bible were written in Latin, then translated into Arabic then translated into English you think it would be the same way fully? I could get on an online translator, translate a sentence into Spanish then French then German then Spanish then English and I would bet moneyi t won't be the same.

In terms of my religion (Orthodox Judaism), we hold that nothing is wrong with being gay. We do however hold that it is wrong to act on this tempation.

I want that TSM kid to come back. Seriously, I need that guy to maybe get some enlightenment on reading things from a totally biased perspective.

Gay stuff isn't logical, because children can't result from it. That's the only thing I see wrong with it. I, however, think love is universal. I don't distinguish my love for my female and male friends. However, I couldn't have anything more than an intimate friendship with a male because I can't have children with a guy, and getting it in the pooper isn't my idea of "making love" A personal preference, so gaylove is perfectly ok by my standards. If they need the officiality of marriage to love eachother, why deny them that?

The only reason why I DON'T appreciate gay people is that [however, I'm not one to say who is gay, and who isn't] it's "cool" to be gay, now. I've heard opinions that homosexuality was reinstated as a marketing ploy for the next best cool thing for teenagers. Waltzing around acting like a *** isn't at all, in any way, a resemblance to who you love. I absolutelly HATE that being gay means being an affeminate man who wears tight geans and butthumps at gaybars. Why, exactly, one needs to be so showy if all that's different about them is their love interests, fails me.

Flashing your gaypride allows me to ask you why the hell you're gay: Is it to fit some steriotypical social class so you can feel unified, or do you truly feel love for the same sex? Or maybe you DO feel love for the same sex, but would love to cash in on it by living it as a "lifestyle." The moment your sex determines your lifestyle is the moment you're a sick pig. A straight guy is a pig if he lives a lifestyle based around his sex, and it's no different for you, gayboys.

I really just hate showy people. I don't wear "Midget Pride" T-Shirts or prefer people call me an Little Person. They can call me midget, crippled, whatever: That doesn't change who I am. If humans weren't so fed up with their goddamned labels, maybe we'd get something done along the lines of equality. Until then, people will DEFINE themselves as equal, and thus, destroy that equality with some sick reasoning of assumed equality.

JediKirby

Also, it isn't logical if children don't result. The first and foremost feeling in any animal is that they need to survive, both them and their species. Homosexuality goes against this in every way.

You just read my ENTIRE post with a big fat biased that made me look like I was attacking homosexuality.

That 3 letter word starting with F means nothing different at all from Gay

Stop kidding yourself if you think applying different words for the same thing makes one more offensive than the other. The N word is only as bad as it's intended. Same with "Black." Intentions make the killer, not the gun.

Episode III sucked.

']So don't.

again I totally disagree, certain words just can't have a good connotation. When would it be ok to use the N word?

']I'm going to blame this on saberopus. He should have done something!

Is there something I'm missing?

This thread is retarded, gay, black and doesn't deserve to be married.

Same goes for you, punk.

um, what are you saying?

also, homophobia is a misnomer. just because i dont agree with gay people's choices doesn't mean i have "an irrational fear" of them.

being gay is not natural. it goes against one of the most basic instincts that all life on earth share - the will to procreate.

being handicapped is not normal - it is a product of, to put it in layman's terms, '****ed up' dna.

I've heard it proposed that the "gay gene" is actually recessive, so it takes two people with the "gay gene" to reproduce and produce a homosexual child. All theory, of course, without any real genetic evidence to back it up.

Mm, yeah. You're right about that part.

But that still doesn't explain how this gay gene helps control population.