Seriously? It's all well and good to be idealistic, but it's just about absurd to say that the loss of human life is always regrettable. The death of Hitler wasn't regrettable in the slightest; Hitler killed a whole lot of innocent people and, if given the chance, would have continued to do to. The same is the case with Bin Laden. Are we really supposed to sit here and mourn the loss of a mass murderer?
A certain amount of "bloodlust," as you put it, is a very healthy human response to some things, and September 11th, not to mention all of the other attacks he has been behind, is one of those things. Should we all fly off the handle for every little thing? Absolutely not. Should our blood lust extend to people who weren't responsible, like the Muslim community as a whole? Absolutely not. But is a sense of relief and celebration understandable after the death of the one responsible for the loss of so many lives? Absolutely! If you're capable of feeling sorry for his death, more power to you, but I think you'll find you're in the minority, and I don't think that's such a terrible thing. The rest of us care more about the senseless loss of innocent lives then the sensible loss of a mass murderer.
Fincham: Where are you going?
Me: I have no idea
Fincham: I meant where are you sitting. This wasn't an existential question.