Massassi Forums Logo

This is the static archive of the Massassi Forums. The forums are closed indefinitely. Thanks for all the memories!

You can also download Super Old Archived Message Boards from when Massassi first started.

"View" counts are as of the day the forums were archived, and will no longer increase.

ForumsDiscussion Forum → Anthony Weiner's wiener's hillarious.
12345
Anthony Weiner's wiener's hillarious.
2011-06-02, 6:34 PM #41
Krok - being annoyed by Wookie is like a massassi-wide sport. I indulge from time to time :P
Fincham: Where are you going?
Me: I have no idea
Fincham: I meant where are you sitting. This wasn't an existential question.
2011-06-02, 8:03 PM #42
I highly doubt that I could pick my own crotch out of a lineup and say with 100% certainty that it was mine... especially if it's covered with something as common as grey boxer briefs.
>>untie shoes
2011-06-02, 8:14 PM #43
Originally posted by Antony:
Yeah, but can you guarantee that you've never owned grey boxer briefs that look like that?


The time period that twitter has been prolific is only a few years, as is the time period of risque pictures being taken on cell phone cameras. it is REALLY not a stretch to say he should be able to remember if he has taken a picture of that part of his anatomy recently. i mean unless some criminal mastermind has spent years guarding a secretly snapped Polaroid of this guys junk in hopes, that ONE DAY!!!! there may be a mass media outlet suitable to release hell upon his arch nemesis!!!!

i mean honestly it does not even matter! Even if its not you just say it probably was a picture you intended to send to your wife who you love very much. i mean seriously. as long as HE didnt actually send it to the girl who it was tweeted to it really does not matter. but the way in which he is answering, or rather not answering questions is just SOOOOOO annoying and typical of limp wristed politicians. good god! just say it is you, or that it is not, or that its nobody's damn business.
:rant:

also this is pretty awesome!

[http://i30.photobucket.com/albums/c334/darth_alran/Capture.jpg]
Welcome to the douchebag club. We'd give you some cookies, but some douche ate all of them. -Rob
2011-06-02, 9:04 PM #44
Slightly disturbing how many of you "men" seem to suggest that pictures of your wieners could be floating around the net. Oh well, I guess they should get some exposure somewhere.

Originally posted by sugarless:
Am I the only one who finds his "unnecessary quotation marks" around "certain words" unbearably annoying in this post? Wookie, your whole argument is moronic - if a politician wants to send dirty pictures, he's not going to do it through a social media website and it's FAR more likely that it was hacked, but why the hell would I care one way or the other? So yes, you making a big issue out of this is annoying and stupid, but the quotation marks I just can't get past.


I haven't really made any argument. I simply started a post about a recent current event that plays off the title of two other recent threads. Unless you're accusing me of "tweeting" Weiner's wiener just to make this a big issue. I can say with complete "certitude" that I did not and that that is not my wiener. My last sentence has actually proclaimed more than Weiner has with regards to this matter.

Originally posted by Michael MacFarlane:
Here's a pretty good evenhanded article that covers most of the important facts. The more I hear, the more I'm leaning toward this being a frame job. The only Twitter user who retweeted the cock shot before it was deleted had been harassing the supposed intended recipient for over a month before this happened, and he'd tweeted a few times before the pic was posted hinting at an impending sex scandal for Weiner. I haven't drawn any firm conclusions yet, but right now it looks like there's a stronger circumstantial case for a hack than there is for it actually being Weiner.


Interesting article and also interesting how easy it is to draw different conclusions. After reading it I think the simplest explanation is that he did "tweet" his wiener. I assume he was probably intoxicated, meant to send it privately, realized later he did not and deleted it. The flurry of juvenile "tweets" at the time seem consistent with intoxication. Maybe he is routinely immature in his twitter posts, I wouldn't know as I don't follow him. Hell, I don't ever look at the "tweets" from people I do follow. I only ever signed up for an account because of the Xbox Live integration. I might pay more attention to the site someday.
"I would rather claim to be an uneducated man than be mal-educated and claim to be otherwise." - Wookie 03:16

2011-06-02, 9:13 PM #45
Originally posted by Wookie06:
Slightly disturbing how many of you "men" seem to suggest that pictures of your wieners could be floating around the net. Oh well, I guess they should get some exposure somewhere.



girls love dick shots, amirite missassians?
Epstein didn't kill himself.
2011-06-02, 9:31 PM #46
Originally posted by Wookie06:
"men" "tweeting" "certitude" "tweet" "tweets"


I see what you did there -_-
Fincham: Where are you going?
Me: I have no idea
Fincham: I meant where are you sitting. This wasn't an existential question.
2011-06-02, 9:38 PM #47
Originally posted by Spook:
girls love dick shots, amirite missassians?

I'm starting to believe that women love dick pics almost as much as we love tit pics.
>>untie shoes
2011-06-02, 10:42 PM #48
Originally posted by Wookie06:
Slightly disturbing how many of you "men" seem to suggest that pictures of your wieners could be floating around the net. Oh well, I guess they should get some exposure somewhere.
I know for a fact at least one of mine is. What man wouldn't want to share his penis with ladies? Doesn't always guarantee that's who'll end up touching themselves while listening to 4 Non Blondes and sipping boxed wine. The jab at the end underscores the fact that you're socially inept and haven't gotten laid since that time you volunteered at the local handicapped shelter.

Quote:
I haven't really made any argument.
Everything in your post after this (and before, honestly) is pointless conjecture.

Quote:
Interesting article and also interesting how easy it is to draw different conclusions. After reading it I think the simplest explanation is that he did "tweet" his wiener. I assume he was probably intoxicated, meant to send it privately, realized later he did not and deleted it. The flurry of juvenile "tweets" at the time seem consistent with intoxication. Maybe he is routinely immature in his twitter posts, I wouldn't know as I don't follow him.
You're right, alcohol is the only leading cause of any misdeed ever. You probably support prohibition. You're probably even a nazi scientologist gay baby eater.

Quote:
Hell, I don't ever look at the "tweets" from people I do follow. I only ever signed up for an account because of the Xbox Live integration. I might pay more attention to the site someday.


Maybe we'll get lucky and it'll be more attention than you pay here and we can all die happy.
error; function{getsig} returns 'null'
2011-06-03, 12:31 AM #49
Originally posted by Alan:
The jab at the end underscores the fact that you're socially inept and haven't gotten laid since that time you volunteered at the local handicapped shelter.


I disagree with this. I don't think he's displayed any obvious signs of being handicapped, and he does have a wife so even though marriages tend to stale over time, I think the not getting laid in such a long time part is unlikely.
Looks like we're not going down after all, so nevermind.
2011-06-03, 1:05 AM #50
To be clear, I'm not entirely sold on the version of events where Weiner was hacked yet. I think it's more likely than not, but it's far from a foregone conclusion. To answer sugarless's doubts (below) specifically, it's at least plausible that Weiner would send Gennette Cordova his cock shots via Twitter. The site does have a private message function, and since Twitter is almost certainly where Weiner and Cordova had their first online contact, it'd be a natural enough place for Weiner to continue the flirtation.

That's the problem with this scandal. In a vacuum, it looks completely plausible. It's only when you look into it a bit further that it starts to look like it was designed to look completely plausible.

Originally posted by sugarless:
Am I the only one who finds his "unnecessary quotation marks" around "certain words" unbearably annoying in this post? Wookie, your whole argument is moronic - if a politician wants to send dirty pictures, he's not going to do it through a social media website and it's FAR more likely that it was hacked, but why the hell would I care one way or the other? So yes, you making a big issue out of this is annoying and stupid, but the quotation marks I just can't get past.


Cut him some slack. He only does that because he's kind of dumb.

Originally posted by ECHOMAN:
I was always under the impression that people's dicks would be unique enough that they would be recognizable for their masters. I mean, no two dicks are the same, right?

I hate to bring up the "I know this like the back of my hand" concept, but if there was a pool of dick pictures, and you had to guess which one of them was yours (given that you contributed to the pool and every dick was photographed the same way), an innate awareness of your own body would allow you to determine this dick, no? Or maybe that wouldn't happen? Even if you aren't aware of the exact details of your own genitals to describe it in words, would your subconscious familiarity of your own schlong would allow you to pick it out from the pack? Same goes for any other body part.

I'm being serious.


Wait, you've seen the picture, right? I'm pretty sure I'd recognize my penis naked, but the member at the center of this controversy is clothed, and only visible as an outline in some guy's boxer briefs.
If you think the waiters are rude, you should see the manager.
2011-06-03, 1:13 AM #51
Originally posted by Antony:
I'm starting to believe that women love dick pics almost as much as we love tit pics.


Everything I've heard says this depends on the woman in question. Some women love 'em, some don't see the appeal at all.
If you think the waiters are rude, you should see the manager.
2011-06-03, 3:24 AM #52
Originally posted by Michael MacFarlane:
Wait, you've seen the picture, right? I'm pretty sure I'd recognize my penis naked, but the member at the center of this controversy is clothed, and only visible as an outline in some guy's boxer briefs.


What.

No, I haven't seen the picture. I thought this picture involves an actual naked penis. I haven't bothered to check up yet.

Well then. This explains A LOT really.
SnailIracing:n(500tpostshpereline)pants
-----------------------------@%
2011-06-03, 3:43 AM #53
Looks like the joke is on me!
SnailIracing:n(500tpostshpereline)pants
-----------------------------@%
2011-06-03, 6:00 AM #54
Who the **** cares?
2011-06-03, 6:18 AM #55
Originally posted by Michael MacFarlane:

Cut him some slack. He only does that because he's kind of dumb.


Haha my apologies. No, in all seriouness, I was a bit harsh. I blame the "quotes"
Fincham: Where are you going?
Me: I have no idea
Fincham: I meant where are you sitting. This wasn't an existential question.
2011-06-03, 11:11 AM #56
Originally posted by ECHOMAN:
What.

No, I haven't seen the picture. I thought this picture involves an actual naked penis. I haven't bothered to check up yet.

Well then. This explains A LOT really.


Ha. Fair enough. If I thought there was a naked penis involved, I probably wouldn't have gone looking for the picture either.
If you think the waiters are rude, you should see the manager.
2011-06-03, 2:31 PM #57
Well, I linked to the picture in the first post. I don't know seems one might recognize their drawers or, at least, be able to disqualify a picture if they look unfamiliar.
"I would rather claim to be an uneducated man than be mal-educated and claim to be otherwise." - Wookie 03:16

2011-06-03, 2:33 PM #58
He said in the Wolf Blitzer interview that he "certainly didn't recognize [the photo]"
>>untie shoes
2011-06-03, 2:40 PM #59
So I just looked at the picture, and I think he could reasonably say that it was in fact a 'thigh pic' and not a dick pic. The presence of cock in the picture is only incidental.

Also I like how no ladies spoke up about not liking dick picks. That means that all women love them.

science
:cool:
Epstein didn't kill himself.
2011-06-03, 2:40 PM #60
Well, that's going pretty far. He's now willing to say that he certainly doesn't recognize the picture that he can't say with certitude isn't him. That's clears it up now.
"I would rather claim to be an uneducated man than be mal-educated and claim to be otherwise." - Wookie 03:16

2011-06-03, 2:52 PM #61
I don't see a problem with it. He doesn't recognize it but can't promise that it's not him. I mean, like macfarlane said... imagine if he says it's not him and somehow it turns out that it is and he just didn't remember the picture existing. It's not that far fetched.
>>untie shoes
2011-06-03, 3:19 PM #62
Boxer shorts are the way to go
"Nulla tenaci invia est via"
2011-06-03, 3:54 PM #63
Alright fine the picture is actually of me. There now we can lay this to rest. The good congress man can now stop giving the press the shaft and everyone else can stop poking fun at him.
Welcome to the douchebag club. We'd give you some cookies, but some douche ate all of them. -Rob
2011-06-03, 6:01 PM #64
Pics or it didn't happen.
"I would rather claim to be an uneducated man than be mal-educated and claim to be otherwise." - Wookie 03:16

2011-06-03, 8:01 PM #65
For that I'll have to refer you to the link in the OP ;)
Welcome to the douchebag club. We'd give you some cookies, but some douche ate all of them. -Rob
2011-06-04, 12:34 AM #66
I knew a girl who wanted some of her close male friends online to send her dick pics. We decided to do so, but to also draw mustaches and such on our junk as well. She was ever so tickled by it all.

-I'll let you interpret that last bit however you please.
2011-06-04, 12:39 AM #67
:/
2011-06-04, 4:12 PM #68
I think it's reasonable to assume that Congressman Weiner is answering questions exactly how his lawyer has advised him to. Discussing any of this with any certainty is ridickulous.
? :)
2011-06-04, 4:34 PM #69
I think my post traveled back in time.

No really, it's kind of freaking me out.
2011-06-05, 2:53 AM #70
Originally posted by zanardi:
Boxer shorts are the way to go


I have to respectfully disagree. I used to be on the same boat, but about 4 years ago I discovered boxer briefs and never looked back. They're better in general on both the comfort level (support, when wearing jeans, etc) and on the looks-level (girls like 'em). My favorite boxer briefs are Calvin Klein classic boxer briefs, but to each their own.

Boxer shorts make me feel like I'm in middle school or something. Like cargo shorts and striped polos.
2011-06-05, 3:31 AM #71
I'm seconding Ragna here! Boxer briefs all the way. They are far too comfy, and offer much more support without looking like a bizarre speedo. With boxers you inevitably have everything down one leg or the other, or even worse! Sometimes you can be doubly cursed and get the frank going down one leg and the beans down the other! Not kosher!!! But boxer briefs eliminate that problem!
Welcome to the douchebag club. We'd give you some cookies, but some douche ate all of them. -Rob
2011-06-05, 11:30 AM #72
Originally posted by Darth_Alran:
Sometimes you can be doubly cursed and get the frank going down one leg and the beans down the other! Not kosher!!!


baaaaaaaaahahahahahahahaha I think I may have laughed a little too hard at the wording there.
Fincham: Where are you going?
Me: I have no idea
Fincham: I meant where are you sitting. This wasn't an existential question.
2011-06-05, 11:44 AM #73
I only own three pairs of 'underwear' and I almost never wear them.

I haven't worn underwear unless I was planning on going swimming or something since I got into the Marines. It's just more fabric separating my bits from the world and that is no good!
Epstein didn't kill himself.
2011-06-05, 11:50 AM #74
you should cut a hole in the front of all your pants then build a jimsuit helmet for your junk into all of them! with a little port hole and everything!
Welcome to the douchebag club. We'd give you some cookies, but some douche ate all of them. -Rob
2011-06-05, 2:12 PM #75
My balls dangle.
error; function{getsig} returns 'null'
2011-06-05, 3:37 PM #76
I usually go commando, since I work at home, but when I need to interact with the outside world at large, I go with briefs. Boxers never felt right to me, like I was wearing pants under my pants.

-Yes, I'm aware that is, on some level, the whole point, but it still feels too crowded.
2011-06-05, 4:05 PM #77
All you guys who go commando are disgusting.
2011-06-05, 4:41 PM #78
You just have to be super-duper-extra more careful that you wipe properly.
the idiot is the person who follows the idiot and your not following me your insulting me your following the path of a idiot so that makes you the idiot - LC Tusken
2011-06-05, 5:04 PM #79
Originally posted by ragna:
All you guys who go commando are disgusting.


I would be willing to bet that commando is the rule rather than exception in the world.

and like Wolfy says I am grown up enough to wipe my ass.
Epstein didn't kill himself.
2011-06-05, 6:11 PM #80
Unless you're putting your hands down my pants, Ragna, I don't see how it matters to you.

-And really, at that point, underwear of any kind would really just be a delay in the proceedings, I say.
12345

↑ Up to the top!