First of all, the main topic: The boy is definitely being wronged. He did not choose to have lesbian mothers, and he was putting gay into proper context. Hell if the school actually looked in a dictionary, rephrasing it to have both man and a woman in there would still be in context.
Copy and pasted quote from the article:
"Gay is when a girl likes another girl"
Could've even been:
"Gay is when a guy likes a girl"
So obviously the boy wasn't in error at all and the people in charge of that school are a bunch of idiots. These people are supposed to be educating when they're ignoring even the most obvious. Pathetic.
Second issue: I'm not even gonna bother with all that religion stuff, I think that's best left for a debate related to that.
Now, actual acceptance of gays. One thing I think that really corrupts the image of gays is things like movies or tv shows, they always show gays as overly sexual, hardly ever do they show them as just normal people. So obviously there are going to be people out there who watch tv and think that that those are the regular actions of a gay person. Ignoring the fact that obviously they would all differ.
I have been around a few gay guys, and they were just like anybody else I talked to. Never was anything odd or anything like that. Obviously just because I know gays that are cool people, doesn't mean that all of them are. There are going to be some bad apples out there. But there are countless people that are bad apples that are heteros as well.
Since when has beating up someone else based on their own preference been useful? How is beating up gays to set them "straight" ok? Nauree, I noticed you failed to see the Hitler comparison. Well considering he sentenced to death several gay people, simply because they were gay. Well obviously that is a very logical comparison.
It's one thing to be uncomfortable with homosexuality, I mean I think it'd be very disgusting to do it with a guy and such. But that's what I think, doesn't mean it should go for everybody. Hey I think cheesecake is gross, but there are several people who think different.
We're not always going to agree, so how is it that when it comes to sexuality, hetero is the only way? When you think about it, both homo and hetero have their extreme parts. I mean S&M and such does go several ways, and yet that hasn't been labeled wrong by the whole hetero community. Why? Because it's ok for heteros to go into extreme sexualitys, but gays to have any sort of sex? NO NO NO WRONG!
It's pointless, it's just a huge basket of hypocricy. It's one thing when you yourself think it's wrong, and don't agree with it. That's your opinion, ok fine. But to those that think their opinion should be followed by everyone because they're hetero, why? What makes you so high and mighty?
Saying it's ok for gays to be discriminated against is basically saying a human should be discriminated against for something personal to them that doesn't affect anybody else. Are you going to turn gay by being around them? No.
So why can't it be left at that, just you don't bother them and they won't bother you. Just let them live out their life, and you keep to yours.
I don't see why this is such a hard thing to do? -_-
Damn my fingers ache now...
------------------
"We came, we saw, we conquered, we...woke up!"