Massassi Forums Logo

This is the static archive of the Massassi Forums. The forums are closed indefinitely. Thanks for all the memories!

You can also download Super Old Archived Message Boards from when Massassi first started.

"View" counts are as of the day the forums were archived, and will no longer increase.

ForumsDiscussion Forum → Why are squirrls on islands?
12345678
Why are squirrls on islands?
2006-01-03, 11:32 AM #161
Originally posted by Jon`C:
I don't think it's possible to make religion a subset of science, or vice-versa. Even if you could do it, you shouldn't because it's stupid.

Science is about logical analysis and dismissal of impossibilities. By definition, matters of faith and the supernatural are beyond the scope of scientific investigation.

Religion is about all of the touchy-feeling nonsense that you can't prove. If you could prove it conclusively, it would cease to be religious faith and become cold fact.


It would be if the religions weren't so damn rigid about everything.
Pissed Off?
2006-01-03, 11:42 AM #162
Originally posted by Avenger:
It would be if the religions weren't so damn rigid about everything.
I... don't think you quite understand what I said.
2006-01-03, 2:01 PM #163
i agree with Jon'C. his post, and explanation, is where religious toleration should stem from.one group of people can use science to make a deuction, and come to a perfectly acceptable conclusion. and another group can assume something else, example creation/intelligent design, and people should just be able to live with that, because it doesn't affect them.

which brings up another topic. which should be taught to kids in school? wait. i'll make a thread.
i know a vegan dairy farmer
2006-01-03, 2:16 PM #164
Originally posted by Jon`C:
I... don't think you quite understand what I said.



I got what you said just fine. I merely mean that if relgion were to progress along with the rest of the world rather than remain caught up on things that were concieved thousands of years ago, there would be far less conflict between the two.
Pissed Off?
2006-01-03, 3:36 PM #165
Bumpernickle.
2006-01-03, 4:55 PM #166
Oh hey, SF_GoldG_01 still hasn't responded yet. I'm shocked!
2006-01-03, 4:58 PM #167
Originally posted by Avenger:
I got what you said just fine. I merely mean that if relgion were to progress along with the rest of the world rather than remain caught up on things that were concieved thousands of years ago, there would be far less conflict between the two.


Then what would be the point of religion?

Now that those in power are relying less upon religion as a platform for power, arbtirary conservatism is all religion has left.
"The trouble with the world is that the stupid are cocksure and the intelligent are full of doubt. " - Bertrand Russell
The Triumph of Stupidity in Mortals and Others 1931-1935
2006-01-03, 6:39 PM #168
Which doesn't help their position very much.
Pissed Off?
2006-01-03, 7:48 PM #169
Come one goldie, answer my questions... or i'll be forced to PM you...
Last edited by mb; today at 10:55 AM.
2006-01-03, 10:53 PM #170
Originally posted by SF_GoldG_01:
All right, I will reply later today, right now I must go.
I think the Toxx Clause should be applied to SF_GoldG_01.
2006-01-04, 12:03 AM #171
No research on the definition of "later today" done. :gbk:
2006-01-04, 3:48 AM #172
still waiting...
Last edited by mb; today at 10:55 AM.
2006-01-04, 7:20 AM #173
Originally posted by CaveDemon:
still waiting...

...
Last edited by mb; today at 10:55 AM.
2006-01-04, 8:00 AM #174
Originally posted by Jon`C:
I think the Toxx Clause should be applied to SF_GoldG_01.


What does he have to come through with?
2006-01-04, 8:27 AM #175
Originally posted by CaveDemon:
...

...
Last edited by mb; today at 10:55 AM.
2006-01-04, 12:12 PM #176
Did anyone notice squirrels was misspelled in the thread title? Just noticed it now.
SnailIracing:n(500tpostshpereline)pants
-----------------------------@%
2006-01-04, 3:10 PM #177
Originally posted by Echoman:
Did anyone notice squirrels was misspelled in the thread title? Just noticed it now.


OMG!
2006-01-04, 3:22 PM #178
I think he fled to some foreign third-world country by now because he fears us so much. :/
DO NOT WANT.
2006-01-04, 3:22 PM #179
Somewhere like Mexico?
2006-01-04, 3:25 PM #180
Somewhere 'round in that area over thar, yeah.
DO NOT WANT.
2006-01-04, 3:53 PM #181
this thread ends here, unless you support me.

Originally posted by SF_GoldG_01:
I will mention some other proofs that can be found on ANOTHER web page, other than the one I posted earlier:

1 Human footprints found inside of dinosaur footprints

so human's were alive when dinosaurs were alive. that doesn't prove anything, except the passing of time. if you like to argue the speed of evolution, feel free to IM me. scaramanga57.
Originally posted by SF_GoldG_01:
2 Evolution has never been observed

evolution does not occur at a rate that any scientist could observe, not in his lifetime at least. it's not like one single primate evolved within his own lifespan into a human.
Originally posted by SF_GoldG_01:
3 Evolution would cause all land animals to be like giraffes

really? why? because the physiology of a giraffe is sooo practical. the planet needs carnivores, too.
Originally posted by SF_GoldG_01:
4 Growth rate of human societies

what are you supporting here. as far as the basics of life, we haven't progressed a whole lot since recorded history. we still fight wars, we grow and eat food, there are a bazillion different languages. creating the internet and art aren't enormous steps. a highly evolved society would have peace and common communication.
Originally posted by SF_GoldG_01:
5 Pre-human fossils

again, what are you supporting. if there are fossils before humans, wouldn't that prove that something existed and through time evolved into man. i understand the bible explains that man was god's last creation, but it also states that it was created in a matter of days. i don't think fossils form that fast, bud.
Originally posted by SF_GoldG_01:
6 Neanderthals didn't exist

what does that prove, anything? no. it has been established by respected scientists that neanderthals, if they existed, were outside of the human evolution chain.
Originally posted by SF_GoldG_01:
7 Cro-Magnon vs. Homo Sapiens brain capacity

what support for creation is there in that? nothing. it only shows the growth of the guman race over time.
Originally posted by SF_GoldG_01:
8 Fossils of extinct proto-humans

proto humans. wouldn't that mean that one spieces existed, stemed a more modern and humanlike race, and then itself died out. yeah.
Originally posted by SF_GoldG_01:
9 Long "extinct" Agraptalyte fish found

because a species was thought to be extinct and is then rediscovered does not disprove evolution in any way. on the contrary, if someone thought that proto human races were extinct, and then a group was found in the jungle, wouldn't that prove evolution?
Originally posted by SF_GoldG_01:
10 Transitional species missing from the fossil record

if there is one supposedly missing, wouldn't that mean you believe that the scientists, the ones that support evolution, know what they are looking for, and just haven't dug up the right rock yet.
Originally posted by SF_GoldG_01:
11 Survival of previous species

what? i missed what you mean in that. IM/PM me.
Originally posted by SF_GoldG_01:
12 The genome cannot increase in complexity; microevolution vs. macroevolution

so humans may have reached a certain stop. i disagree, but i'll throw you a bone. does that disprove the evolution of any other species?
Originally posted by SF_GoldG_01:
13 Organic material cannot come from inorganic; thus evolution could not have started up.

i'll throw you another bone. this may actually be the only place we agree. say god created the first single celled organism. how did we get were we are?
Originally posted by SF_GoldG_01:
14 Second law of thermodynamics:

this refers to the state of matter, not the state of life. as long as water is made up of 2 hydrogens and one oxygen, life can continue.
Originally posted by SF_GoldG_01:
15 Missing geological column

wait. is you thread talking about life, or rocks. either way, that statement is meaningless.
Originally posted by SF_GoldG_01:
16 Inter-species mating

a mule never hurt anyone...
Originally posted by SF_GoldG_01:
17 Missing proof

you're the one missing proff, jacka**



the last bone i throw you, and i hope you dig it up before it fossilizes ( what a tragedy that would be), i am a christian. i believe in creationism. figure your **** out, though.
i know a vegan dairy farmer
2006-01-04, 4:36 PM #182
:eek: wow... i think you made maybee one relevent(sp?) point. but as to the squirls bit... the island of maui; hawaii, actually has a really bad cat problem. the way i see it. iether pangea or humans introducing new species can explain how any squirl got on any land mass... unless your talking about an island in a lake in which case as has already been stated... squirls can swim

if you need evidence of evolution, just look at any number of viruses in existance today.
Welcome to the douchebag club. We'd give you some cookies, but some douche ate all of them. -Rob
2006-01-04, 4:41 PM #183
Originally posted by Echoman:
Did anyone notice squirrels was misspelled in the thread title? Just noticed it now.


Oh, crap! All this time, we've been debating about squirrels when we should have been debating about squirrls!

I feel so stupid! :o
the idiot is the person who follows the idiot and your not following me your insulting me your following the path of a idiot so that makes you the idiot - LC Tusken
2006-01-04, 5:06 PM #184
Not only is he a coward, but he's also a liar. I see SF_GoldG_01 learns a lot in his bible group.
2006-01-04, 6:46 PM #185
Originally posted by saxmanga:
if someone thought that proto human races were extinct, and then a group was found in the jungle, wouldn't that prove evolution?


Uhh it'd disprove it; evolution requires that ancestral species no longer exist at the time that their descendents do

(Why the popular misconception "humans came from apes" is false .. as apes are still around)
一个大西瓜
2006-01-05, 4:12 AM #186
Well not from those apes that are still around obviously :rolleyes:
APT 1, 2, 3/4, 5/6
TDT
DMDMD

http://veddertheshredder.com
2006-01-05, 10:28 AM #187
this thread is dropping quick, my relevant theory to keep in line with the rest of the argument:

squirrels appear on islands because spiderman put them there.

oh and jon, in golds defence, after seeing the quality of his posts,, i wouldnt be surprised if one piece of homework takes him half a week.
2006-01-05, 3:23 PM #188
My bump, my bump my lovely lady bumps.

(Yes I'm aware it's humps on the song)

/me continues on the popcorn munching mission
2006-01-06, 7:52 AM #189
Still waiting.
2006-01-06, 8:08 AM #190
[http://www.secondstoryrep.org/images/shows/Godot.jpg]
■■■■■■■■
■■■■■■■■
■■■■■■■■
■■■■■■
■■■■■■■■
■■■■■■■■
■■■■■■■■
enshu
2006-01-06, 9:00 AM #191
Squirrels have submarines!
Ban Jin!
Nobody really needs work when you have awesome. - xhuxus
2006-01-06, 12:09 PM #192
bump :o
Welcome to the douchebag club. We'd give you some cookies, but some douche ate all of them. -Rob
2006-01-06, 12:18 PM #193
Originally posted by Tenshu:
[http://www.secondstoryrep.org/images/shows/Godot.jpg]


<3

[http://www.qwantz.com/comics/guest3/justin1.png]
2006-01-06, 1:58 PM #194
:)
Attachment: 9693/mini-555470f84.jpg (126,908 bytes)
■■■■■■■■
■■■■■■■■
■■■■■■■■
■■■■■■
■■■■■■■■
■■■■■■■■
■■■■■■■■
enshu
2006-01-06, 7:34 PM #195
nobody has refuted my spiderman point yet...

i win the thread.
2006-01-06, 7:36 PM #196
[QUOTE=Mr. Stafford]nobody has refuted my spiderman point yet...

i win the thread.[/QUOTE]

There are no buildings in water. So Spiderman can not drop squirrels off at the island.

There.
SnailIracing:n(500tpostshpereline)pants
-----------------------------@%
2006-01-06, 8:24 PM #197
You forgot about Atlantis! Spiderman swung on the buildings in Atlantis to get the squirrels to the island!
Ban Jin!
Nobody really needs work when you have awesome. - xhuxus
2006-01-06, 9:07 PM #198
No, because Atlantis isn't even in our galaxy anymore.

Maybe there's an aquatic spiderman.
Stuff
2006-01-06, 9:22 PM #199
This shocks me. Jon`C, you are so immature it amazes me.

He thinks it's false. Leave it at that. Stop trying to convince him to see your ways, and leave him be.

As for the squirrels, Time and unforseen occurences. Like some have said.
2006-01-06, 9:29 PM #200
Originally posted by Echoman:
There are no buildings in water. So Spiderman can not drop squirrels off at the island.

There.


he is a human with the ability of a spider without being as frail as an insect (i know a spider is an arachnid, before the bastards pick holes in this perfect argument).

Therefore... HE CAN SWIM FOUR TIMES FASTER THAN ANY HUMAN!!!
12345678

↑ Up to the top!