http://www.cnn.com/2004/LAW/11/29/scotus.medical.marijuana.ap/index.html
This isn't a debate about pot, but:
I simply don't understand how on earth the supreme court can look at the constitution and infer laws from it that make Medicinal Marijuana alright. I mean, I can understand how one could make inferences about things that would make women legally eligable for abortion, but what would a supreme court judge cite to say that medicinal marijuana should be legal or not?
Gah!
This isn't a debate about pot, but:
I simply don't understand how on earth the supreme court can look at the constitution and infer laws from it that make Medicinal Marijuana alright. I mean, I can understand how one could make inferences about things that would make women legally eligable for abortion, but what would a supreme court judge cite to say that medicinal marijuana should be legal or not?
Gah!