I'm trying not to be rude to people who disagree with me; that is correct.
Your comment that we should understand the debates about the constitution are very important. When the French wrote the Declaration of the Rights of the Man in 1789, they were faced with a big problem of how to actually contextualize the ideas. It turned out that declarations such as "Men are born and remain free and equal in rights. Social distinctions may be founded only upon the general good." are pretty much impossible to implement without additional knowledge and societal context. Some dialectic needs to be had to understand which social distinctions, and to get some approximation of what we think is generally good, and how you understand and plan to enforce rights.
So when you're reading the Declaration of Independence, for instance, there are lines such as:
I don't see this as all too different from the declarations of the many failed French constitutions. These are nice sounding declarations, but hold little meaning without understanding context.
I think conservatives tend to see socialists and communists as evildoers who need to be stopped. If communists truly believe capitalist systems destroy life, liberty and the ability to seek happiness, and are not derived from the consent of the governed, is it not their right to proverbially storm the Bastille and put in a new government? I don't think Wookie would prefer this reading, but without context the Declaration of Independence doesn't exclude it.
Context is key.