MAGA should be defined by the honorable people who choose to associate with it, not the violent racists they tacitly tolerate and pander to for political advantage

lol

I have no idea what you’re talking about but I’m fascinated to learn

Not sure about Kentucky.

Generally it's just the progressives that favored eugenics. Modern progressives still seem allied with modern Nazis, the Islamists, but I don't pretend to know to what ends or if it's just a marriage of convenience.

It's not clear from the (full) video that anyone was in fact shouting "build that wall" (let alone directing it toward the Native American guy rather than the BHI guys), but I guess my point was that they were already kinda racist by having that slogan in the first place.

According to witnesses and video subsequently appearing on social media, the Black Hebrew Israelite men shouted racially combative insults and slurs at both the Native Americans and the high school students.[1][6][10] They called the students "a bunch of incest babies", future "school shooters," and "dirty ass little crackers", called African American students the N-word, and said "you give ******s rights".[6][11][12][13] Many students reacted by saying things such as "woah" and "easy".[13] The Black Hebrew Israelites also called a passing Black man who tried to disagree with them a "coon," told Indian activists that the word Indian means "savage," and said to a woman who had stopped to argue with them: "Where’s your husband? Bring your husband. Let me speak to him."[11][14]

Nothing screams civil like paying a PR firm to explain how civil you are

yeah I know it’s super weird how these rich white private Christian school students are being held to a higher standard than a fringe cult with members most would consider mentally ill

I also have to wonder. What exactly is one paying for when they hire an expensive PR firm. What are they doing with that money, bribing CNN?

Davos, Switzerland (CNN Business)When the global business elite last gathered in Davos for their annual shindig, one bitcoin was worth $10,000. This year, a unit of the cryptocurrency buys just $3,560.

Bitcoin, its alternatives and the technology that underpins them were a major talking point at last year's World Economic Forum. The collapse in value is reflected in a much lower profile this time around.
The "CRYPTO" and "BLOCKCHAIN" signs that littered the Ski resort's promenade last year have all but disappeared, and bitcoin has virtually vanished from the official forum agenda. There was a line to get into last year's big panel debate on cryptocurrencies; there were plenty of empty seats on Wednesday.
But the discussion was perhaps more mature.
Elizabeth Rossiello, the founder of digital payments platform BitPesa, explained how the industry was evolving. She pointed to her company, which operates across Africa, as an example.
BitPesa allows people to transfer funds by using bitcoin to move money across borders.
"We don't want to replace the local African currencies ... we want to make it easier to have African currency pairs," she said.
Rossiello argued that digital currencies have shaken off their reputation as only being useful for hiring an "assassin" on the "dark web."

Bitcoin is 10 years old. But it won't go mainstream until it's regulated
Bitcoin is 10 years old. But it won't go mainstream until it's regulated
She said that her company follows EU anti-money laundering "know your client" regulations. That means every customer has to provide their name, address, date of birth and source of funds.
But this being Davos, there was also a skeptic on the panel. Harvard professor Kenneth Rogoff, who has in the past likened bitcoin to a lottery ticket, said that digital currencies remain vulnerable to manipulation.
"If someone wants to do mischief, there seem to be ways to do it. And then who do you call? Oh, we decentralized it," he said.
Rogoff, who is known for his work on financial bubbles, said the chance of cryptocurrencies taking over traditional money is "zero." But he acknowledged that he can see why bitcoin seems like a good solution for countries like Venezuela that are struggling with hyperinflation.
The discussion ended with a vote on what's next for cryptocurrencies. Asked whether "the whole thing is totally overhyped and quite dangerous," only one member of the audience raised a hand.
That person? Gottfried Leibbrandt, CEO of the global international payments system Swift.

We wouldn't have to worry about any of this corruption if everyone would just get on board with making America great again.

Hey Reid, did you know the people who teach us that everybody has value are the real eugenicists? I always thought it was those guys who march in the streets calling for the extermination of the lesser races, but someone who tolerates them for political advantage just told me I was wrong. It was really his political adversaries all along.

I’m not sure where he learned this. Like all Republicans, he never watches Fox News (and really considers himself an independent) so I bet he learned it from a very trustworthy source.

Socialism is the true eugenics since it murders the successful and rewards the weak.

IDK what you can even say to a person who is very deliberately not interpreting anything fairly. A socialist advocated something once? Forget context or other analysis, socialism now bears that cross.